1. College of Medical Technology, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 611137, China.
2. State Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 611137, China.
3. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu, China.
Lung cancer is a highly fatal disease that poses a significant global health burden. The absence of characteristic clinical symptoms frequently results in the diagnosis of most patients at advanced stages of lung cancer. Although low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening has become increasingly prevalent in clinical practice, its high rate of false positives continues to present a significant challenge. In addition to LDCT screening, tumor biomarker detection represents a critical approach for early diagnosis of lung cancer; unfortunately, no tumor marker with optimal sensitivity and specificity is currently available.
Metabolomics has recently emerged as a promising field for developing novel tumor biomarkers. In this paper, we introduce metabolic pathways, instrument platforms, and a wide variety of sample types for lung cancer metabolomics. Specifically, we explore the strengths, limitations, and distinguishing features of various sample types employed in lung cancer metabolomics research. Additionally, we present the latest advances in lung cancer metabolomics research that utilize diverse sample types. We summarize and enumerate research studies that have investigated lung cancer metabolomics using different metabolomic sample types. Finally, we provide a perspective on the future of metabolomics research in lung cancer. Our discussion of the potential of metabolomics in developing new tumor biomarkers may inspire further study and innovation in this dynamic field
Keywords: Lung cancer, Lung Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Biological Marker, Metabolomics, Metabonomics, Chromatography, Mass spectrometry
Lung cancer is the cancer with the highest mortality rate worldwide. According to recent statistics, in 2022, an average of nearly 1,700 people died every day in the United States, with more than 350 deaths attributed to lung cancer each day, which is more than the combined number of deaths from breast cancer, prostate cancer, and pancreatic cancer .
Lung cancer is characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of lung tissue cells. Uncontrolled proliferation that is not treated on time can quickly spread to tissues near the lungs and eventually to other parts of the body. Lung cancer is divided into central and peripheral types according to their location. According to its biological characteristics, lung cancer is divided into non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), of which NSCLC accounts for about 80%. NSCLC includes large-cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and other types [2, 3]. The means of the diagnosis of lung cancer include laboratory tumor markers, imaging examination and histopathologic analysis of biopsy .
Lung cancer has high mortality rate as it is difficult to make an accurate and effective early diagnosis. The majority of patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage lung cancer. Statistics show that about 15% of patients are diagnosed during the initial stages (stages I-II). Effective treatment is possible at this stage, with a 5-year survival rate of about 60%. In contrast, almost 60% of patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease (stage IV), prognosis is very poor, with a 5-year survival rate below 5% . Other studies have found that 2-year progression-free survival is a reliable surrogate for overall survival in lung cancer, with a 24-month progression-free survival of 40.3% and overall survival of 69.4% after treatment with chemotherapy plus surgery . In recent years, low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been widely used in the early screening of lung cancer. Compared with chest radiography, LDCT screening can reduce the risk of lung cancer mortality by approximately 20% [7-9]. However, LDCT screening can lead to high false-positive results. A previous meta-analysis found that across all trials and cohorts, 20% of individuals in each screening round screen positive and require some level of follow-up. In the final results, only approximately 1% of individuals had lung cancer . A high false-positive rate will not only waste the resources of diagnosis and treatment but also cause unnecessary panic to people. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find sensitive and specific markers for the diagnosis of lung cancer to supplement the deficiency of imaging examinations.
Metabolomics is a major branch of system biology. It is an emerging discipline and technology in the era of “post genomics.” It is one of the most active fields of life science research worldwide. Since the introduction of the concepts of metabolomics, it has aroused great interest from scientists worldwide. Scientists have realized that changes in the genome are not necessarily reflected in the biological phenotype; that is, they do not affect the life system. The production of a series of small-molecule metabolites is the final result of various reactions and changes in organisms and the human body. They can directly and accurately reflect the physiological and pathological states of organisms. If biology is regarded as information science, the study of metabolomics provides information on the biological information flow, between the levels of genes and cells, and plays a connecting role in the transmission of biological information. Therefore, some scientists have concluded that genomics tells you what may happen, proteomics tells you what will happen, and metabolomics tells you what has happened [11, 12].
Compared with other omics methods, metabolomics also has the following characteristics. First, small changes at the genetic level are amplified at the metabolite level, making it easier to detect physiological and pathological changes in vivo. In addition, metabolomics technology requires a relatively complete database of metabolite information, but since the number of metabolites in vivo is much smaller than the number of whole genome sequencing data, the construction and improvement of metabolomics database is relatively easy [13, 14]. Because metabolomics reflects the terminal effect under the comprehensive action of various factors and is highly integrated, metabolomics has great potential for identifying reliable biomarkers of various diseases .
The aim of this article is to provide an academic account of the application of metabolomics in lung cancer research, with a specific focus on its advancements in identifying new potential metabolic biomarkers for lung cancer diagnosis. To achieve this, we begin by briefly introducing and discussing the metabolic pathways impacted by lung cancer. Subsequently, we describe the commonly used instrumental platforms in lung cancer metabolomics and explore the various sample types and sources employed in such research.
The main points of this review center on the advantages, disadvantages, and characteristics of various sample types utilized in lung cancer metabolomics research. We carefully selected and analyzed a large number of representative articles in recent years to summarize and discuss the latest research results of lung cancer metabolomics in different sample types. Finally, we look forward to the future prospects of metabolomics research in lung cancer. By providing a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art advances in lung cancer metabolomics research, we hope to inspire further research and development in this vital field.
As a malignant tumor, lung cancer disrupts multiple metabolic substances and pathways in the human body. Firstly, the rapid proliferation of lung cancer cells inevitably leads to an increase in anaerobic oxidation, resulting in responsive changes in a series of metabolites associated with glycolysis. Secondly, due to the extensive growth of lung cancer cells, there is a significant increase in the consumption of lipids, especially phospholipids, which serve as important building blocks for cell membranes. Furthermore, many amino acids and their derivatives are also involved in the altered metabolic pathways caused by lung cancer. For example, glutamine serves as an important nutrient source for cancer cells, while serine acts as a precursor for purine nucleotides and plays a crucial role in DNA synthesis and cell proliferation. The following is a classification introduction of the metabolic substances and pathways affected by lung cancer [16, 17].
As early as the middle of the last century, Otto Warburg, a famous physiologist in Germany, discovered that unlike normal cells, which mainly rely on mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation for energy supply, most cancer cells mainly rely on glycolysis for energy supply. This phenomenon was later called the “Warburg effect,” which has been discussed and verified in many generations . Studies have shown that due to the increased energy expenditure of cancer tissues, the concentration levels of a series of enzymes related to glucose metabolism such as phosphofructokinase, 3-phosphoglycolaldehyde dehydrogenase, phosphoglycolate kinase-1, pyruvate kinase, and pyruvate dehydrogenase increase significantly .
Because cancer cells use the glycolytic pathway for energy supply, the accumulation of lactate affects the lactate cycle . Lactic acid is the most commonly detected metabolite, whether using blood samples or tissue samples from lung cancer patients [21-25]. In recent years, a study has used carbon isotopes to label glucose and glutamine and to analyze metabolic pathways using isotopic tracers. The study confirms that glucose in cancer patients is indeed substantially converted to lactate and that glucose and glutamine are the major sources of carbon in the TCA cycle . In addition, Some research teams pointed out the relationship between tumor aggressiveness and the level of lactic acid elevation; that is, the more aggressive the tumor, the more dependent the tumor metabolism is on the glycolysis pathway, and thus the higher the level of lactic acid detected [27, 28].
Lipid metabolism changes in tumor patients are manifested as endogenous lipid hydrolysis and fatty acid oxidation enhancement, increased triglyceride conversion, decreased exogenous triglyceride hydrolysis, and increased plasma free fatty acid concentration. Increased lipolysis and oxidation of fatty acids leads to decreased body fat storage and weight loss. Therefore, fat consumption is one of the main features of tumor cachexia . Previous studies have reported that the levels of unsaturated lipids, LDL, and VLDL in the serum of cancer patients are significantly reduced, which may be due to the proliferation and invasion of tumors, thus causing a large amount of lipid consumption [22, 23].
Choline is a metabolite commonly found in the body. Compared with healthy individuals, the concentration of choline in the serum of lung cancer patients is reduced as it is the precursor of phospholipids in the cell membrane, which is consumed through the rapid division and reproduction of malignant tumors . Phosphatidylcholine is composed of choline and phosphatidylic acid, and is the main component of the cell membrane. The concentration of phosphatidylcholine in serum gradually increases with invasion and metastasis of cancer cells [24, 25].
Sphingomyelin is the main component of the cell membrane. Its metabolites, such as sphingosine, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and ceramide, are bioactive signaling molecules that can be used as first or second messengers to regulate cell growth, differentiation, aging, and apoptosis, and many other important signal transduction processes . To explore the role of plasma S1P and ceramide levels in the diagnosis of lung cancer, Alberg et al. performed a nested case control study. Increased plasma levels of S1P and total ceramide increase lung cancer risk. Furthermore, we suggest that disorders of sphingolipid metabolism and production of S1P may be linked to lung cancer pathogenesis and could be potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of lung cancer .
Lysophosphatidylethanolamine (LPE) is a lysophosphatidylcholine involved in cell signal transduction in vivo. Yu et al. found that LPE can be used as a diagnostic marker for NSCLC. Compared with those of healthy controls, LPE concentrations were elevated in the plasma of patients with NSCLC, especially in patients with adenocarcinoma. In addition, the concentrations of lecithin ethanolamine were also significantly elevated in the plasma of patients with lung cancer .
Due to the increase in glycolysis, alanine concentrations in lung cancer patients will naturally increase. The uptake of leucine, valine, and isoleucine is also increased in lung tumors as they are required for the production of TCA cycle intermediates [32, 33]. Phenylalanine is a precursor of tyrosine and neurotransmitters such as dopamine, norepinephrine, and adrenaline. The serum phenylalanine level in lung cancer patients usually significantly increases due to the downregulation of genes involved in phenylalanine metabolism in tumor cells .
Glutamine is an important component of the amino acid metabolism. Glutamine is a substance that cancer cells depend on for their survival and reproduction. It does not only play an important role in the synthesis of various proteins but also participates in the synthesis of fats and nucleotides. Glutamine is an important nitrogen and carbon source for a variety of biochemical pathways in the body. When the body lacks local glucose supply, glutamine can also be used as the raw material for cancer cells to obtain energy. Glutamine and water are broken down into glutamic acid and ammonia, respectively, under the action of glutaminase. Glutamate and pyruvate then form α-ketoglutarate and alanine, respectively, under the action of pyruvate transaminase. A-ketoglutarate then enters the TCA cycle to produce energy. Glutamine hydrolysis produces ammonia and glutamate to balance the pH of tumor cells, which may explain the high glutamate levels observed in the NSCLC patient group [22, 23, 35]. Further, glutamine can also be used to determine the prognosis of cancer. When NMR technology was used to analyze patients' serum metabolites, patients with higher glutamine levels survived longer, while those with lower glutamine levels survived shorter .
Cysteine and glutamic acid are important GSH components. Fahrmann et al. found that the concentrations of cysteine and glutamate were significantly increased in patients with lung adenocarcinoma by comparing tumor tissues with control tissues. In addition, many enzymes associated with glutathione biosynthesis, glutathione cycling, allobiotic metabolism, and nitrogen balance are significantly increased . Serum histidine and threonine levels are reduced in lung cancer patients due to the increased utilization of the glycine, serine, threonine, and pyrimidine pathways [23, 37]. Some researchers have pointed out that serine is a key node in cancer cell metabolism. The serine synthesis pathway provides serine for protein synthesis in cancer cells. The serine synthesis pathway, together with glycolysis and the 1C metabolic pathway, forms a crucial metabolic network for tumorigenesis. Specifically, the serine synthesis pathway is an important destination for the glycolysis intermediate 3-phosphoglycerate. Therefore, monitoring serine metabolism is of great significance for studying the occurrence and development of lung cancer as well as improving the treatment of lung cancer .
In recent years, an increasing number of lung cancer metabolomics experiments have not only provided new potential markers for the early diagnosis of lung cancer, but also studied the metabolic pathways affected by lung cancer to gain a deeper understanding of its pathogenesis [38, 39]. It should be noted that,even with the same type of lung cancer, patients with different disease stages will show different metabolic characteristics. Zhang et al. indicated that the serum glutamine concentration in lung cancer patients was significantly higher than that in normal controls . By contrast, Puchedes-Carrasco et al. observed a reduction in serum glutamine levels in lung cancer patients compared with that in normal controls . When the similarities and differences between the two studies were compared, the stages of lung cancer cases used in the study differed. The former study focused on patients with early-stage lung cancer, while the latter study included patients with all stages of lung cancer, and the proportion of patients with advanced-stage lung cancer was relatively large. Therefore, the serum glutamine concentration is related to the stage of lung cancer, and glutamine tends to increase in the early stage of lung cancer due to the stress response. In the advanced stage of lung cancer, patients often present with cachexia, a wasting syndrome, and glutamine is largely decomposed as a functional substance; therefore, the blood shows a downward trend. Therefore, we must pay attention to the different stages of the same disease may produce some obvious differences.
In general, the common metabolic alterations in lung cancer metabolomics studies include glycolysis pathway , tricarboxylic acid cycle pathway , pentose phosphate pathway , etc. Unfortunately, these metabolic alterations are often reported in other tumors and thus lack specificity. Some less mentioned pathway alterations may merit continued attention and in-depth study, such as biodegradation pathways of aromatic compounds , phospholipid metabolism , putrescine and spermidine generation and transformation . Exploration and in-depth discussion of the alterations in these metabolic pathways may lead to a deeper understanding of the mechanism of the disease.
NMR is the main technique used in metabolomics research and has become one of the schools of metabolomics research. The NMR detection and analysis platform is characterized by nondestructive and unbiased sample detection without complicated sample preprocessing. It has good objectivity, easy quantification, simple analytical conditions, and good reproducibility. However, compared with MS, it has relatively low sensitivity and limited dynamic range; hence, it is difficult to simultaneously determine the metabolites with large concentration differences coexisting in biological systems. To improve the sensitivity of NMR techniques, the field intensity was increased using cryogenic probes and microprobes [45, 46]. In recent years, high-resolution magic angle spinning proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy detection has been increasingly used, which can directly detect in vitro tissues, without physical or chemical processing of samples, to obtain higher-resolution spectrograms. Especially when the tissue structure is not damaged, high-resolution spectral information can be obtained to screen the metabolites, which can move freely in the cell solute with appropriate rotation speed [47, 48].
MS analysis is characterized by its high sensitivity and is one of the most important and widely used platforms for metabolomics analysis [49, 50]. In addition, MS can detect ions without protons or carbon, such as metal ions. As a detection technology, MS can overcome certain limitations of NMR. MS is usually combined with chromatography and is characterized by the separation of complex mixtures into single components. With the development of MS and its combination technology, the rapid analysis and identification of multiple compounds have been achieved. Therefore, an increasing number of researchers have applied MS to metabolomic studies [51-54]. In recent studies, isotopic tracer technology using an MS platform has been developed to explore the metabolism and signal pathways more intuitively and accurately, thereby obtaining new and valuable biological insights .
GC-MS is suitable for the separation and analysis of samples that are stable and easy to gasify, particularly for the separation of homologues and isomers [56, 57]. The sensitivity, efficient separation, high-resolution, and good repeatability of GC-MS make it suitable for the analysis of complex metabolic mixtures. More importantly, this method has a reference and comparative standard spectrum library among different laboratories worldwide, which can be used for the characterization of metabolites. GC-MS has been criticized for the need for derivatization of many samples, which increases the time required for sample preparation. For metabolites with low volatility, GC-MS is either unable to measure or requires complex sample pretreatment steps. These shortcomings restrict the application of this detection method to a certain extent.
Compared with GC - MS, LC - MS has higher sensitivity and wider testing scope, so the LC - MS in metabonomics analysis in recent years has been widely used. LC-MS avoids the complex sample pretreatment in GC-MS. Because front-loaded liquid chromatography allows easy separation of mixtures, LC-MS can be used to detect potential markers in complex biological samples [58, 59].
Conventional C18 columns are commonly used for the separation of components, but for hydrophilic metabolites, they are poorly retained in reversed-phase chromatography. In order to solve this problem, Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography was used for the analysis and detection of hydrophilic substances. Different types of ionization methods can be selected according to the metabolites to be measured. Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization method is the earlier electrical method developed, while matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization method is increasingly used in current metabolomics research due to its superior effect [60-62].
CE-MS is another characteristic and noteworthy technology in metabolomics research. Compared with GC-MS, which is only suitable for volatile substances, CE-MS can easily analyze non-volatile substances without cumbersome derivatization steps. Compared with LC-MS, CE-MS is particularly suitable for the separation of polar and charged compounds because, in principle, the technology is based on the charge-to-mass ratio of the compounds. Therefore, CE-MS is frequently utilized in metabolomic research and can be complementary to the above methods. CE-MS has many advantages. It does not require complicated pretreatment schemes, it consumes very few organic solvents, it does not require organic solvents, it uses cheap fused silica capillaries instead of expensive chromatographic columns, and the analysis and separation of components is convenient, cheap, and fast. However, CE has low stability and sensitivity, and the supporting schemes for combined use with MS are also less than those of GC-MS and LC-MS [63, 64].
NMR and MS, the two pillar platforms in metabolomics research, are widely used in the study of physiological and pathological metabolism. NMR does not require cumbersome sample preparation, and its detection is convenient and fast. It does not destroy the sample, and the same sample can be tested repeatedly without sample loss. NMR is the only metabolomics platform that can be used for in vivo detection. One of the greatest criticisms of NMR is its low sensitivity (relative to mass spectrometry), and some metabolites at low concentrations may be difficult to detect. MS has been increasingly used in metabolomics research in recent years. MS is often combined with chromatographic techniques to enable better separation of metabolites. GC-MS technology has high sensitivity and a good separation effect, and is very suitable for the detection of volatile and less polar substances. The GC-MS technology is relatively stable and has good repeatability. In terms of substance identification, relatively mature and complete public databases are available for reference and comparison. However, GC-MS can only detect non-volatile and polar substances. Although the volatility of the tested substances can be enhanced by derivatized pretreatment, the detection of such substances remains a technical problem. To a large extent, LC-MS technology can compensate for the deficiencies of GC-MS. It can detect difficult-to-detect volatile and polar substances, and can flexibly replace chromatographic columns and columns with different characteristics according to the experimental needs. During the mobile phase, the range of detectable substances is significantly increased. The main limitation of LC-MS technology is that the compatibility of public databases is not strong enough, and material characterization is more dependent on the established local databases or standard substances, which is cumbersome to operate and has high cost ratio. CE-MS is rarely used; this method is especially suitable for the separation of charged compounds and macromolecular substances and can be used as an effective supplement to the above methods. If energy and funds are sufficient, the multi-platform combined analysis can cover more metabolite species, which is conducive to the screening of metabolic markers for lung cancer diagnosis and identification (Table 2).
Various types of metabolomic samples are available. Generally speaking, the common sample types in metabolomics experiments for the diagnosis of lung cancer are as follows: blood (including serum and plasma), urine, saliva, expiration (organic volatiles), alveolar lavage fluid, skin, tissues, and cells. Each type of specimen has its own unique pretreatment method, and its functions also differ.
Blood is one of the most common and popular sample types in metabolomics research. The blood metabolome undergoes dynamic changes at various stages of the organism's own genetic replication, transcription, and translation, and is continuously regulated by the body, reflecting the individual's health or disease status. These changes are induced by endogenous or exogenous metabolites, such as those provided by diet or oral medications. Therefore, blood metabolomics has been widely applied in the exploration of potential disease biomarkers, pharmacodynamics, and the discovery of drug targets, providing relevant clues for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases [65, 66].
Serum samples, as a widely utilized sample type in metabolomics research, hold significant importance. The preparation procedure for serum samples is relatively straightforward, involving the natural coagulation of blood followed by centrifugation. Such simplicity allows for the application of diverse analytical methods, including mass spectrometry, chromatography, and nuclear magnetic resonance, thus enabling comprehensive metabolomic analysis. Serum samples serve as valuable resources in capturing various metabolic alterations associated with diseases. Utilizing these samples, researchers are able to explore and identify potential disease markers. The rich metabolomic information obtained from serum not only aids in deciphering the underlying metabolic changes induced by diseases but also offers promising avenues for disease diagnosis [67, 68].
Published in 2018, Hu J et al. collected serum samples from 43 healthy individuals and 39 patients with advanced-stage NSCLC, tested the samples using NMR, and analyzed the differences in metabolites shown on hydrogen NMR spectra. The serum levels of glutamate, glycoprotein, lactic acid, phenylalanine, alanine, tyrosine, proline, and tryptophan were Significantly elevated, while the levels of glutamine, taurine, glucose and glycine were reduced in patients with NSCLC compared with those in healthy individuals. Therefore, serum metabolites are potential biomarkers for NSCLC diagnosis .
In a scholarly publication from 2020, Chen et al. conducted a study involving 142 patients with NSCLC and 159 healthy controls. Serum samples were collected from both groups and subjected to analysis using the LC-MS platform. After comparison and statistical analysis, the results showed that there were 35 significantly different metabolic biomarkers between the two groups. Compared with the healthy population, the serum levels of metabolites such as C16-Sphinganine, Phytosphingosine, Sphinganine, Capric acid, and Arachidate were increased in lung cancer patients, while metabolites such as lysoPC(18:2), acyl-carnitine C10:1, and Inosine were decreased. The researchers performed a combined analysis of the ROC curves of the differential metabolites and ultimately identified a separation model containing six differential metabolites: lysoPC(18:2), acyl-carnitine C10:1, L-Tryptophan, Indoleacrylic acid, Inosine, and Hypoxanthine. The sensitivity of this model was 95.7%, and the specificity was 95.0%. In addition, the research team further accessed relevant transcriptomic data through the TCGA database. The metabolomic and transcriptomic data can be matched and validated with each other, revealing disturbances in metabolic pathways such as glycolysis, amino acid metabolism, phospholipid metabolism, and fatty acid metabolism in NSCLC patients .
The following year, Schult et al. collected serum samples from 79 NSCLC patients and 79 healthy controls, and used high-resolution magic angle spinning (HRMAS) proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) to measure differences in metabolites between the two groups. The experiment showed that changes in organic acids, amino acids, carnitine, sugar phosphates, vitamins, coenzymes, nucleosides, nucleobases, and derivatives could establish a model for early diagnosis of lung cancer. The metabolic pathway disorders affected by lung cancer were most evident in glycolysis and tricarboxylic acid cycle metabolism. Furthermore, this model could also predict the 5-year survival rate of lung cancer patients .
In a scholarly publication by Jiaoyuan et al. in 2023, the researchers aimed to investigate the serum samples of 193 patients diagnosed with NSCLC and 243 healthy controls. Notably, 70% of the samples from each group were randomly selected for analysis and modeling, and the remaining 30% were used as a validation set to test the modeling results. In this study, the serum was detected using a mass spectrometry analysis platform, and a total of 278 statistically different metabolites were found by comparing and analyzing the metabolite concentrations between the two groups. Among them, the serum levels of metabolites significantly increased in lung cancer patients included 11,12-Epoxy-(5Z,8Z,11Z)-icosatrienoic acid, Cholic acid, 11-Deoxyprostaglandin, Glycocholic acid, and Docosahexaenoic acid ethyl ester, which were more than 2 times higher in lung cancer patients than in healthy controls. In contrast, metabolites such as 2,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid, Salicylic acid, and Piperine were significantly decreased in the serum of lung cancer patients. Algorithms such as Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were used to establish a model for lung cancer diagnosis, which was tested using samples from the validation set. The sensitivity of the random forest model was 74%, and the specificity was 92%, indicating that the model had high specificity and could be used for exclusive diagnosis. The sensitivity of the support vector machine model was 83%, and the specificity was 89%, indicating that the overall diagnostic accuracy was high. Pathway analysis found that the most significant disturbances in lung cancer patients occurred in the phenylalanine, linoleic acid, and bile acid metabolism pathways .
Plasma is a vital sample type that plays a crucial role in metabolomics research. It constitutes the supernatant fraction obtained from blood that has been mixed with an anticoagulant, retaining fibrinogen. While the majority of the components present in plasma are similar to those found in serum, including hormones, inorganic ions, amino acids, sugars, lipids, and various other metabolites, the response intensity of certain substances in nuclear magnetic resonance or mass spectrometry may differ from that observed in serum. Despite these differences, plasma remains widely deployed as a key sample type in metabolomics analysis. By comparing metabolic differences between plasma derived from patients versus healthy individuals, valuable insights for disease diagnosis and treatment can be gleaned. The information gleaned from plasma samples may help identify potential disease markers and facilitate the development of precision medicine approaches [65, 72].
In a scholarly publication from 2018, Peng et al. conducted a study aimed at predicting the response of patients with lung cancer to chemotherapy based on platinum. The researchers collected plasma samples from 43 patients with varying chemotherapeutic outcomes and analyzed them using LC-MS-based metabolomics. The study employed a rigorous methodology involving multivariate statistical, pathway, and correlation analyses, leading to the identification of eight biomarkers that demonstrated significant correlations with the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy .
According to a recent scholarly publication in 2021, Zheng et al. aimed to identify potential serum diagnostic biomarkers for lung cancer. The researchers conducted an analysis of plasma samples obtained from both lung cancer patients and healthy individuals using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Multiple algorithms were applied to screen and identify candidate biomarkers. The study findings revealed the diagnostic value of several differential metabolites, such as oleic acid, 2-hydroxybutyric acid, cholesterol, and inositol, in accurately diagnosing lung cancer . In the same year, Sarlinova M et al. designed an interesting metabolomics experiment using plasma samples. Plasma samples were collected from 132 patients with primary lung cancer and 47 patients with secondary lung cancer. Metabonomics analysis showed that there was no significant difference in plasma metabolites between primary lung cancer and secondary lung cancer.Compared with the healthy control group, the common characteristics of the lung cancer group were significantly increased glucose, citrate, acetate, 3-hydroxybutyrate, and creatinine levels, and decreased pyruvate, lactic acid, alanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan levels. The differential metabolites mentioned above can be used as auxiliary modes for diagnosing lung cancer .
In the exploration of disease biomarkers, most researchers prefer untargeted metabolomics as it is a comprehensive and unbiased detection strategy that facilitates the discovery of novel metabolic markers. However, if the target metabolites to be studied and detected have been pre-defined, targeted metabolomics is a better choice. Untargeted metabolomics can only achieve relative quantitation based on the response intensity of signal peaks, whereas targeted metabolomics enables precise quantitative analysis by setting standards and isotopes. Cao et al. collected plasma samples from 128 lung cancer patients to explore biomarkers that can distinguish between squamous cell lung cancer and adenocarcinoma of the lung. They used an LC-MS analysis platform to conduct targeted metabolomics detection based on endogenous metabolites. The results showed that 2-(methylthio)ethanol, cortisol, D-glyceric acid, and N-acetylhistamine could effectively distinguish between squamous cell lung cancer and adenocarcinoma of the lung. The diagnostic model established using these four biomarkers had a sensitivity of 92.0% and a specificity of 92.9%. In addition, through KEGG database analysis of metabolic pathways, it was found that the differences between the two types of lung cancer mainly occurred in the riboflavin metabolism pathway and the steroid hormone biosynthesis pathway .
DBS testing, in which whole-blood samples are collected on paper, has certain advantages over conventional methods of blood sample collection. Dried blood plaques have been used to measure phenylalanine levels since the 1960s [76, 77]. From the perspective of sample collection, it requires less amount of blood and is less invasive compared whole-blood collection. As regards sample preservation, dried blood plaque is more stable than traditional blood samples; thus, its storage and transportation costs are much lower than that of whole blood . Owing to the simplicity and high stability of the DBS method, it has been widely applied in disease diagnosis [79, 80]. In recent years, scholars have proposed that using 80% acetonitrile as the extraction solvent and injecting internal standards after the chromatographic column is beneficial for metabolomics research based on DBS. Tests have shown that using this method can effectively improve the quality of detected data .
In a study published in 2020, Yu et al. collected DBS for metabolomic studies of lung cancer. The DBS samples from 37 SCLCs, 40 NSCLCs, and 37 controls were analyzed. A combination of five differential metabolites was selected to establish a lung cancer diagnosis model, and the diagnostic accuracy of the combination was 95% for male SCLC patients and 94% for female SCLC patients by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. In subsequent studies, a validation cohort comprising 78 individuals was used to further evaluate the performance of the discriminant model. Results showed that the accuracy rates of the developed discriminant model were 91% for men and 81% for women .
Which sample type of serum and plasma is more suitable for the study of metabolomics has aroused a wide discussion among researchers [83, 84]. When using serum or plasma for metabolomics studies, the results produced by these two sample types will inevitably differ to some extent due to the differences in the preparation methods and production principles of the two samples . The serum does not require the addition of anticoagulants, which avoids the matrix effect caused by anticoagulants and the potential interference of anticoagulants on metabolic activities . However, the formation of blood clots requires a long wait time. During this process, some unstable metabolites may be degraded, resulting in the loss of potential marker metabolites . Another influencing factor is that platelets release a variety of compounds into the serum during coagulation, including peptides, hypoxanthine, and xanthine [88, 89]. Therefore, a standardized process should be followed during serum sample collection, as well as during the coagulation of all samples. Based on the above reasons, using plasma for metabolomic analysis is a better strategy. The collected plasma no longer needs to undergo additional steps related to blood coagulation and can be directly centrifuged and stored after mixing, which makes the experimental results obtained by plasma analysis more repeatable .
The choice of anticoagulants must be considered when using plasma in metabolomic studies. The experimental results of some researchers showed that there was only a slight difference between the results of common anticoagulant heparin and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in the metabolomic analyses . However, some scholars believe that EDTA does not only inhibit blood coagulation but also suppress the production of magnesium ion-dependent enzymes in red blood cells, such as glycolytic enzyme hexokinase, thus making plasma more suitable for metabolomic applications . Anticoagulants are usually pre-added to vacuum-sampling tubes. Goldberg et al. compared the differences in metabolomic studies of lung cancer patients when using Streck and heparin tubes for blood collection; blood samples from 42 patients with suspected lung cancer were collected in Streck and heparin tubes, and were used for metabolomic analysis using LC-MS. Statistical analysis showed that leucine and other 18 kinds of compound concentration in Streck tube is higher, and 15 compounds such as LysoPC concentration is higher in the heparin tube .
Some researchers believe that serum is the preferred sample type for metabolomics studies, because plasma contains anticoagulants, and common anticoagulants such as EDTA, citrate, etc., can interfere with the metabolic fingerprint generated by NMR spectroscopy . A recent study showed that among the metabolites associated with the diagnosis of the disease, including acylcarnitines, bilirubin, nucleosides, etc., the concentrations of these metabolites in serum were significantly different from their detected concentrations in plasma samples supplemented with different anticoagulants For this reason, when conducting multi-center, large-sample metabolomics studies, it is important to consider the interference and impact caused by different types of blood samples collected by different institutions.
Urine is an important type of sample in metabolomic studies. Using urine as a metabolomic sample has a series of advantages. First, the collection of urine is noninvasive; hence, it is easier to obtain, and patients or volunteers are more willing to cooperate . Moreover, changes in urine samples include the joint effects of endogenous and external environmental factors, such as diet, exercise, and metabolism of the intestinal microbiota. Therefore, urine samples can be used for a comprehensive process. However, when using urine as a sample, we must also pay attention to the following problems. First, urine samples must be collected at a fixed time according to the needs of the test (e.g., collecting morning urine). Moreover, it may contain cells (such as red blood cells, white blood cells, and epithelial cells), bacteria, tubular cells, fat droplets, mucus filaments, and other components . Hence, it is necessary to add an appropriate amount of preservative to the urine sample to ensure its stability. In addition, because urine samples are usually collected by the subjects themselves, the researchers should inform the subjects in advance of the precautions for collecting urine. Finally, it should be noted that similar to the two studies mentioned below, the urine biomarkers of lung cancer found by metabolomics are still in the laboratory research stage, and their real application in clinical diagnosis or prognosis evaluation of lung cancer may need several years of exploration and practice .
In a study published in 2014, Mathé et al. collected urine samples from 1005 subjects, including 469 patients with non-small cell lung cancer and 536 healthy controls. The samples were analyzed using an LC-MS instrument platform, and the results were statistically analyzed. It was found that the levels of creatinine riboside and N-acetylneuraminic acid (NANA) were significantly elevated in cancer patients compared to healthy controls. The researchers then collected another 80 urine samples from patients with non-small cell lung cancer and 78 from healthy controls to verify the reliability of the two biomarkers. The validation results were consistent with the initial experiment. The authors further pointed out that the higher the levels of creatinine riboside and N-acetylneuraminic acid, the poorer the prognosis of lung cancer patients .
In a study published by Seow et al. in 2019, a case-control research design was implemented. They selected 275 female lung cancer patients from a pool of non-smokers and chose 278 healthy female controls of similar age for comparison. Urine samples were collected from both groups and analyzed using mass spectrometry and NMR techniques. The study results revealed a protective association between 5-methyl-2-furoic acid and lung cancer risk. This metabolite is partially derived from soy-related dietary products. The authors speculated that bioactive compounds present in soy may possess antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, which could inhibit tumor growth, invasion, and induce cell apoptosis.Furthermore, exposure to environmental pollutants, particularly long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution, increases the risk of developing lung cancer. Disruptions in certain systemic metabolic pathways, such as one-carbon metabolism and oxidative stress response, have also been associated with lung cancer risk .
Zhao et al. analyzed the changes of metabolic substances in the urine of lung cancer patients and explored its potential pathogenesis using bioinformatics. Based on the case-control experiment, urine metabolites were detected by LC-MS platform. Statistical analyses were performed using Multivariate to identify potential lung cancer markers. Thirty-five potential markers were found. Five key markers were found to correlate well linearly with serum biochemical indices after screening and optimization. In addition, further studies have shown that glutamine metabolism disorder and amino acid imbalance are closely related to the occurrence and development of lung cancer .
In a study published in 2021, Ahmed et al. collected 29 pairs of urine samples and 32 pairs of serum samples from early-stage lung cancer patients before and after surgery. The samples were analyzed using mass spectrometry and NMR, and the results showed that the changes in urinary metabolites were greater than those in blood before and after surgery in lung cancer patients. In urine samples, the concentrations of Leucyl proline and isopentenyladenine significantly decreased after surgery, with Leucyl proline decreasing to 1/625 of its pre-surgery concentration and isopentenyladenine decreasing to 1/31 of its pre-surgery concentration. However, the concentration of N6-methyladenosine increased to 27 times its pre-surgery concentration after surgery. The researchers believed that surgery, as a direct intervention, divided the metabolic state of patients into having cancer (pre-surgery) and not having cancer (post-surgery), and the metabolic biomarkers identified in this study could be used as a basis for monitoring treatment effects and possibly for diagnosing the presence or absence of lung cancer .
Saliva is secreted by salivary glands and has functions such as cleaning the oral cavity, moisturizing the oral cavity, and pre-digesting food. As a biological fluid that can reflect the physiological and pathological status of the human body, saliva has metabolic components similar to tissue fluid and is a sample type worthy of attention in clinical diagnosis. In addition, saliva sample collection is non-invasive and sampling is very convenient, with high patient compliance, making it suitable for early disease screening of large-scale populations [100, 101].
In a study published in 2021, Nijakowski et al.'s systematic review paper introduced the research progress of metabolomics studies of saliva samples in the diagnosis and treatment of multiple tumor diseases . Specifically, in the field of metabolomics in lung cancer, Jiang et al collected saliva specimens from 89 patients with early-stage LC, 11 patients with advanced-stage LC, and 50 healthy controls. To screen for potential saliva biomarkers for early diagnosis of lung cancer, researchers used an ultra-low noise TELDI-MS platform to detect the metabolic profiles of saliva samples. By using statistical methods to analyze metabolic differences among groups, researchers combined 23 altered saliva metabolites to establish a model that can distinguish between LC patients and healthy controls, with a sensitivity of 97.2% and specificity of 92% .
According to a paper published in 2022, Takamori et al. collected saliva samples from 41 patients with LC and 21 patients with benign lung lesions (BLL). To explore the differential metabolites between the two groups of samples, researchers used a capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry platform to test and analyze saliva metabolic products. In addition, in the process of data analysis, a multiple logistic regression (MLR) model was established to evaluate the distinguishing ability of each saliva metabolite.The analysis detected ten significantly different metabolites between the two saliva sample groups from LC and BLL patients. The concentration of tryptophan (Trp) was significantly lower in the saliva samples from the LC group than the BLL group. The concentrations of choline, thymine, cytosine, phenylalanine (Phe), leucine (Leu), isoleucine (Ile), lysine (Lys), and tyrosine (Tyr) in the saliva samples from the LC group were higher than those from the BLL group, but the difference was not significant. The MLR model combination of diethanolamine, cytosine, lysine, and Tyr had a good distinguishing ability for distinguishing between BLL and LC (AUC = 0.729) .
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are a collective term for a class of organic matter present in the air at room temperature in the form of vapor, and the products that are excreted after trans-pulmonary metabolism are called endogenous VOCs, which are the products of human metabolism; thus, dynamic changes in its concentration, as well as in its composition, can reflect changes in the human body in terms of physiology, with relevance to cancer or other diseases . As early as 1971, Linus Pauling, a Nobel laureate, conducted a preliminary study of VOCs in respiration. The gas exhaled through the lungs is a complex mixture of approximately 250 VOCs . Breathing is also closely associated with lung function. It can collect metabolic information that reflects a variety of lung diseases, including lung cancer. Moreover, it is a fast, convenient, and completely noninvasive sample collection method, and patients or volunteers are more willing to cooperate.
Sakumura et al. used GC-MS to analyze the incorporation of lung cancer patients and healthy controls, and performed subsequent statistical analysis based on multiple combinations of lung cancer-associated VOCs to diagnose lung cancer. Using GC-MS analysis, 68 different VOCs were detected, including methanol, CH3CN, isoprene, and 1-propanol. The support vector machine algorithm was used to optimize and select a set of combinations containing five VOCs. This combination is sufficient to achieve a screening accuracy of 89.0%; therefore, it can be used to design and develop a breath sensor analysis system for lung cancer diagnosis .
BAL is an important test for the diagnosis of respiratory and pulmonary diseases. Although BAL is a nearly noninvasive test, saline lavage often induces cough and other discomforts; therefore, 2% lidocaine is usually injected for tracheal local anesthesia. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is rich in metabolically related biochemical substances and has a unique value in the diagnosis of respiratory diseases, including lung cancer .
Leblic et al. collected bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from lung cancer patients and screened these samples for presence of different metabolites by GC-MS analysis combined with bioinformatics analysis. The results show that glycerol and phosphate can be used not only in the diagnosis of lung cancer, but also in the prognosis of the disease .
The skin is the largest organ of the human body and also the most superficial. As an unconventional specimen type in metabolomics research, sampling of skin surface specimens is often overlooked by researchers. Changes in the composition of substances such as sweat, sebum, and stratum corneum emitted by the skin can reflect alterations and abnormalities in metabolic pathways in the body, making the metabolic substances on the skin surface an external manifestation of the body's physiological or pathological state [109, 110]. The generation of sweat is easily disturbed by internal or external factors. For example, factors such as the temperature of the environment in which the subject is located or the subject's own exercise status can have unstable effects on sample collection. Therefore, it is necessary to unify these conditions as much as possible when collecting sweat samples .
There are various ways to collect sweat, one of which is the use of hydrogel micro-patches, which are patches made of polytetrafluoroethylene with internal cavities to absorb sweat [112, 113]. Overall, sweat collection is a non-invasive, easy-to-collect, and highly compliant sampling method. As an unconventional sample, sweat metabolomics research has great research space and prospects 
Calderon et al. established a model based on sweat metabolites to distinguish between lung cancer patients and healthy individuals. The researchers collected sweat samples from 41 lung cancer patients and 55 healthy controls. Notably, among the healthy controls, 24 were active smokers and 31 were non-smokers. The liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry platform was used to detect the concentration of metabolites in the two groups of sweat samples. The research team used PanelomiX to develop two models. The first model aimed for high specificity and was composed of three metabolites: suberic acid, a tetrahexose, and a trihexose. Analysis showed that this model had a specificity of 80% and a sensitivity of 69%. The second model aimed for high sensitivity and was composed of three metabolites: nonanedioic acid, a trihexose, and the monoglyceride MG(22:2). Analysis showed that this model had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 69%. This experiment demonstrated the potential of sweat, an unconventional sample, for lung cancer diagnosis .
Compared with other methods, obtaining tissue samples is undoubtedly a more invasive method. However, tissue specimens also have unique advantages. Due to the differences in diet, living habits, and other aspects of various individuals, blood, urine, and other specimens are affected by many non-experimental factors. Tissue specimens can be collected from the same cancer tissue and adjacent tissue (or normal tissue), significantly reducing the influence of interference factors [21, 115].
In a study published in 2017, Chen et al. collected cancer tissue samples and para-cancer normal tissue samples from 32 cancer patients and analyzed the metabolomic signatures of cancer tissues using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Multivariate statistical analysis showed that lipid, aspartate and choline metabolites in tumor tissues changed significantly at different time points. The authors believe that this technique will be useful in the diagnosis and staging of cancer .
According to a paper published in 2022, You et al. collected cancer and paracancerous tissues from 131 lung cancer patients and performed non-targeted metabolomics analysis based on LC-MS. Statistically, fatty acids, amino acids and most lysophospholipids were significantly increased in lung cancer tissues. However, 6-phosphogluconate, 3-phosphoglycerate, phosphoenolpyruvate, and citrate levels were decreased in lung cancer tissues. In addition, pathway enrichment analysis of lung cancer patients showed that energy, amino acid, and lipid metabolism were significantly disturbed . That same year, Mo et al. compared lung adenocarcinoma, benign pulmonary nodules and healthy tissue samples, using LC-MS to detect the three groups of samples and analyze their differential metabolites. The concentrations of metabolites such as creatine, glycerol and adenosine 3' -monophosphate were significantly different among the three groups. Further pathway analysis revealed that metabolites involved in central carbon metabolism pathway were most significantly altered in lung adenocarcinoma tissues, while disorders of protein digestion pathway were the main altered features of benign lung tumors .
In contrast to other samples taken from humans, the cells were grown in a controlled environment, meaning that non-experimental factors such as sex, age, lifestyle habits, and living environment were avoided. Therefore, by studying the metabolite differences between lung cancer cells and normal cells, the differential metabolites can be more accurately determined and the mechanism can be further investigated.
In the scholarly literature published by Filipiak et al. in 2019, the authors investigated the metabolites extracted from adherent cells of a lung cancer cell line. By utilizing CE-MS technology, the researchers were able to analyze metabolic processes such as the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) and glycolytic metabolic pathway in lung cancer cell lines. Through this analysis, the study revealed that some intermediate metabolites within these metabolic pathways were significantly higher in concentration, while the concentration of some tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediate metabolites was reduced. This method of analyzing metabolic pathways in cancer cell lines provides valuable insights into the pathogenesis of cancer and can lead to further discoveries in understanding the disease .
In general, the different sample types mentioned above had distinct characteristics. Collecting urine samples and VOCs in exhaled breath has significant advantages from a less invasive and painless perspective. Because the concentration of urine varies greatly throughout the day, a fixed time for urine collection should be imposed, and the same amount of water should be consumed. Urine samples should be collected before drinking water in the morning. Preservation of breath samples is difficult; therefore, testing should be performed immediately after sample collection. Tissue samples are more preferred from the perspective of reducing interference factors. Metabolomics studies using tissue samples usually do not require additional volunteers to act as control groups because tissues from lung cancer patients can be directly compared with those from healthy individuals. However, it is often difficult to access the patient's tissue. The collection of BAL and exhaled VOCs may be beneficial to finding more specific markers for lung cancer. Both sample types taken directly from the lungs and respiratory tract may detect metabolic markers more relevant to lung disease compared with blood, a biological fluid that permeates multiple systems in the body. In addition, unconventional sample types such as saliva and skin sweat have unique characteristics, which are convenient to collect and easy to be accepted by patients. The study of these samples also contributes to the early diagnosis of lung cancer (Table 1).
To integrate the advantages of various sample types, some scholars have collected multiple samples for metabolomic analysis. Ahmed et al. developed a new non-invasive detection method for lung cancer to search for novel biomarkers. Blood, urine and respiratory condensate were collected from lung cancer patients. The metabolite changes in lung cancer patients before and after surgery were detected and analyzed using NMR and mass spectrometry. The authors believe that the changes of metabolic substances in patients with lung cancer before and after surgical resection have potential clinical application value in lung cancer screening . Xu et al. considered polyamines as one of the most important biomarkers in cancer research. Plasma and urine samples were collected from patients with lung cancer and liver cancer, and these biological fluids were analyzed by UHPLC-MS. The concentration was then transformed into an independent variable by binary logistic regression analysis to determine the characteristics of patients. Significant independent variables were considered potential biomarkers and further verified by cluster analysis. Results showed that the ratio of putrescine to spermidine in plasma samples and the ratio of s-adenosine-l-methionine to n-acetylspermidine in urine samples could be successfully applied for the identification of patients with lung cancer and liver cancer . From this point of view, collecting multiple sample types in one study can help identify more sensitive and specific biomarkers to more reliably diagnose lung cancer and differentiate it from other diseases.
Metabolomics is concerned with the increase and decrease of small-molecule metabolites in various matrix samples, which is the final result of the joint action of human genes and the environment, and contains abundant physiological and pathological information. Such studies usually include several steps such as sample collection and processing, instrumental analysis and detection, data processing and metabolic analysis (Figure 1). Metabolomics techniques can contribute to the search and development of biomarkers for various tumor diseases, including lung cancer. These biomarkers are promising tools for disease screening [40, 119], diagnosis [120, 121], exposure factors [122, 123], treatment [124, 125], prognosis  and mechanistic studies (Table 3).
Comparison of instrument platform characteristics and collection methods of each sample type
|Sample type||Features||Collection method||Analytical|
●Sample collection is relatively easy
●Contains comprehensive metabolic information
① Take blood samples from patients before breakfast.
② Centrifuge the blood samples at 3,500 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C to obtain serum.
③ Freeze the serum sample at -80°C.
|Plasma (EDTA used as anticoagulants):|
① In the morning, draw 8 ml of blood from volunteers after an overnight fast into evacuated tubes containing EDTA as anticoagulant.
② Immediately separate plasma by centrifuging the blood samples at 4,500 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C.
③ Freeze the plasma at -80°C.
|Plasma (heparin used as anticoagulants):|
① Collect venous blood from the forearm and place it in a 10-ml Strek tube or a 10-ml heparin vacuum tube.
② Invert the tube 3-4 times, and centrifuge it at 450 g for 10 minutes at room temperature.
③ Drain the supernatant, and transfer the sample to a 0.5-ml storage tube. Store the tube at -80°C.
|Urine||●Noninvasive, pain free|
●Sample collection is convenient and easy
|① Collect fasting morning urine from patients.|
② Centrifuge urine samples at approximately 3,500 rpm for 15 minutes at 4°C within 2 hours, and isolate the supernatant.
③ Centrifuge the supernatant at approximately 3,000 rpm for 8 minutes at 4°C. Then transfer 1-2 ml of the supernatant to a 2-ml cryotube.
|① Collect morning urine samples from patients after an overnight fast in a sterile cup.|
② Obtain 1 ml aliquot of the sample, and store it at -80°C freezer.
③ Before testing, the sample is thawed and centrifuged at high speed.
|Saliva||●Noninvasive, pain free|
●Sample collection is convenient and easy
|① Participants were asked not to eat or drink for at least 1.5 hours prior to saliva collection.|
② Participants rinsed their mouths with water and were instructed to spit saliva into 50-cc Falcon tubes kept in paper cups filled with crushed ice.
③ Store the saliva sample at -80°C until further analysis.
|Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)||●Noninvasive, pain free|
●Metabolic information directly reflecting lung disease
|① Before sample collection, instruct volunteers not to eat or smoke for several hours and remain in the room for at least 10 minutes.|
② In a consultation room, have volunteers exhale their respiratory tract air into a 1-L Analytic Barrier Bag.
③ Immediately after exhaling, have them blow their alveolar breath into the same bag.
|Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL)||●Unique value in diagnosing respiratory diseases||① Collect BAL samples from the lungs and bronchial lavage.Place each sample in a 1 ml Eppendorf tube.|
② Store the Eppendorf tubes at -80°C.
|Skin (sweat)||●Unique unconventional sample types|
●Simple collection and high patient compliance
|① Use a sweat inducer to heat the skin for 5 minutes.|
② Cover the skin with a sweat collector to collect sweat for 15 minutes.
③ The collected sweat is stored at -80 ° C.
|Tissue||●Cancer tissue and normal tissue can be collected simultaneously from the same individual, thereby greatly reducing the influence of interfering factors||① After surgical resection, rapidly excise each cancer tissue sample.|
② Immediately freeze the cancer tissue sample in liquid nitrogen.
③ Store the tissue sample at -80°C until further analysis.
Comparison of instrument platforms
|●Higher sensitivity and|
●Suitable for less polar substances
●Suitable for volatile substances
|●Require tedious derivatization|
●Not suitable for volatile samples
|●Higher sensitivity and|
●Applicable to many types of samples
●No need for derivatization
|●No standard metabolite database|
●Chromatographic mobile phase must be configured in advance.
●Some chromatographic mobile phases may be harmful to humans or the environment.
|●Nondestructive testing without destroying the sample|
●Simple sample preparation
●Can be used for liveness detection
●Limited dynamic range
In future studies, if conditions permit, the sample size can be expanded and non-experimental factors (such as age, sex, underlying diseases, diet, and other living habits) can be controlled to reduce the influence of these interfering factors on the experimental results. The accurate identification and characterization of metabolites from massive data in the untargeted metabolomics stage have always been difficult . The improvement of various metabolomics databases and the development of machine learning schemes, as well as the continuous improvement of the performance of various detection instruments, may provide more reliable means to accurately and efficiently find differential metabolites. Following untargeted metabolomics analysis, the addition of targeted metabolomics studies can enable further validation of the selected differential metabolites . Of course, differential metabolites are not equal to disease biomarkers, and rigorous medical validation is needed prior to their application in clinical practice.
Schematic diagram of the metabolomics workflow.
In the latest research, with the continuous intersection of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, multi-omics joint analysis has become a new research hotspot [69, 129]. In addition, the emergence of spatial metabolomics has allowed researchers to more accurately understand the spatial location of metabolic changes in diseases [130, 131]. Researchers can conduct joint analyses by integrating spatial metabolomics and multi-omics data to obtain more comprehensive and abundant biological information, and then conduct more in-depth mechanistic research on the disease.
Metabolites in lung cancer
|Year of publication||Sampletype||Grouping||Analytical|
|2018||Serum||43HC,39 NSCLC||1H-NMR||(+)Proline, lactic acid, phenylalanine, alanine, tyrosine, glutamic acid, glycoprotein, and tryptophan|
(-) Glucose, glycine, glutamine, taurine, phosphocreatine, and threonine
|LC-MS||(+)C16-Sphinganine, Phytosphingosine, Sphinganine, Capric acid, and Arachidate|
(-) lysoPC(18:2), acyl-carnitine C10:1, and Inosine were decreased
|1H-NMR||(+) ADP, Diphospho-glycerate, Fructose-6-phosphate|
(-) ATP,NADP, 1,7-Dimethyl-xanthine
|LC-MS||(+) 11,12-Epoxy-(5Z,8Z,11Z)-icosatrienoic acid, Cholic acid, 11-|
Deoxyprostaglandin, Glycocholic acid, and Docosahexaenoic acid ethyl ester
(-) 2,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid, Salicylic acid, and Piperine
|2018||Plasma||43LC||LC-MS||Compared with the progressive disease group, the elevated metabolites in the partial response group were as follows: tryptophan, pyroglutamic acid, citric acid, succinic acid, phenylalanine, α-ketoglutaric acid, 2-hydroxyglutaric acid, and tyrosine|||
|1H-NMR||(+) Glucose, citrate, acetate, 3-hydroxybutyrate, and creatinine|
(-) Pyruvate, lactate, alanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan
|2021||Plasma||57LC,59 HC||GC-MS||(+) 2-Hydroxybutyric acid|
(-) Cholesterol, oleic acid, inositol, and 4-hydroxybutyric acid
|2016||Plasma and urine||50LC,|
50 Liver cancer
|LC-MS||The ratio of putrescine and spermidine concentration levels in plasma can be used to discriminate between liver and lung cancer.|||
|2019||Serum and tissue||93LC,29HC||1H-NMR||(+) Lactate, glutamate, and glycerophosphocholine|||
|2021||Urine and serum||29 urine samples and 32 serum samples|
(Sampling before and after surgery)
(-)Leucyl proline and isopentenyladenine
The variation range of urine metabolites before and after operation was greater than that of serum in patients with lung cancer
|LC-MS||(+)N-acetylneuraminic acid, creatinine riboside|||
|2019||Urine||275 female LC, 278 female HC||1H-NMR||(-) 5-methyl-2-furoic acid|
Air pollution increases the risk of lung cancer
|2020||Urine||68HC,72LC||LC- MS||(+) Glycyl-glycine, 4-pyridoxic acid, crithmumdiol, 1-methylhistidine, tryptophan, and glutamine|
(-) 8-Hydroxynevirapine and indoxyl sulfate
|2020||DBS||37SCLC,37HC||LC-MS||(+) Ceramide and sphingomyelin|
(-) Glutamate, riboflavin, serotonin, hypoxanthine, cholic acid, arachidonic acid, ethanolamine, and L-aspartic acid
|2017||VOCs||107LC,29HC||GC-MS||The combination of CHN, methanol, CH3CN, isoprene, and 1-propanol can diagnose lung cancer, but it does not indicate the increase or decrease in the level of a single substance.|||
|2016||BAL||24LC,31HC||GC-MS||(+) Acetic acid, palmitic acid, and stearic acid|
(-) Lactic acid, glycerol, L-glycine, L-aspartate, L-proline, L-glutamine, benzoic acid, fructose, phosphoric acid, isocitric acid, inositol, and galactoseInosine, oleic acid, and cholesterol
|2013||Tissue||9LC||CE-MS||(+) Lactic acid, phosphofructokinase, and pyruvate kinase. Most amino acids, especially branched-chain amino acids|||
|2017||Tissue||32LC||1H-NMR||(+) Lipids, aspartate, and choline-containing|||
|2020||Tissue||131LC||LC-MS||(+)Almost all amino acids and most lysophospholipids, fatty acids|
(-) 3-Phosphoglyceric acid, 6-phosphogluconic acid, phosphoenolpyruvate and citric acid
|2020||Tissue||10 AdLC ,|
|LC-MS||Differential metabolites such as glycerol, creatine and 3-monophosphate can be used for the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer|||
|2019||Cell||Lung cancer adherent cell line||CE-MS||The concentration of some intermediate metabolites in pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) and glycolytic metabolic pathway in lung cancer cell lines was significantly higher, and the concentration of some intermediate metabolites in tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle was decreased|||
|2015||Skin (sweat)||41LC, 55HC||LC-MS||nonanedioic acid, suberic acid, a trihexose, a tetrahexose and the monoglyceride MG(22:2) can be used to distinguish between healthy and lung cancer patients|||
|2021||Saliva||89 early-stage LC,|
11 advanced-stage LC,
|TELDI-MS||Screening out 23 metabolites mainly related to amino acid and nucleotide pathways|||
|2022||Saliva||41 LC, 21 benign lung lesions||CE-MS||Diethanolamine, cyclosine, lysine, and tyrosine can be used to distinguish between lung cancer and benign lung lesions|||
Abbreviations in this table:
(+) Elevated markers (compared with healthy controls), (-) reduced markers
HC, healthy control; LC, lung cancer; PLC, primary lung cancer; SLC, secondary lung cancer; SCLC, small-cell lung cancer; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; SqLC, squamous cell carcinoma of the lung; AdLC, adenocarcinoma of the lung; LCCL, lung cancer cell line; DBS, dried blood spot; VOCs, volatile organic compounds; BAL, bronchial lavage fluid; NADP, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82003001), Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2022NSFSC1584), Sichuan Medical Association Research Project (S20087), and the Sichuan Cancer Hospital Outstanding Youth Science Fund (YB2021033).
The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.
1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2022 72
2. Testa U, Castelli G, Pelosi E. Lung Cancers: Molecular Characterization, Clonal Heterogeneity and Evolution, and Cancer Stem Cells. Cancers. 2018 10
3. Sanaya BS, Victor VB, Miller DM, Frieboes HBJM. A review of metabolism-associated biomarkers in lung cancer diagnosis and treatment. 2018; 14: 81.
4. Molina JR, Yang P, Cassivi SD, Schild SE, Adjei AAJMCP. Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. 2008; 83: 584-94.
5. Eggert JA, Palavanzadeh M, Blanton AJSON. Screening and Early Detection of Lung Cancer. 2017; 33: 129-40.
6. Noriko K, Yukinori M, Takashi S, Masakazu O, Takamasa M, Norio A. et al. Recurrence patterns and progression-free survival after chemoradiotherapy with or without consolidation durvalumab for stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Journal of Radiation Research. 2022: 1.
7. Wood DE, Kazerooni EA, Baum SL, Eapen GA, Ettinger DS, Hou LF. et al. Lung Cancer Screening, Version 3.2018. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2018;16:412-41
8. Jonas DE, Reuland DS, Reddy SM, Nagle M, Clark SD, Weber RP. et al. Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association. 2021;325:971-87
9. Krist AH, Davidson KW, Mangione CM, Barry MJ, Cabana M, Caughey AB. et al. Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association. 2021;325:962-70
10. Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, Azzoli CG, Berry DA, Brawley OW. et al. Benefits and Harms of CT Screening for Lung Cancer A Systematic Review. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association. 2012;307:2418-29
11. Qiang B, He F, Zeng Y. Forum on frontiers of science and technology: lifeomics and translational medicine. Science China Life sciences. 2013;56:199-200
12. He F. Lifeomics leads the age of grand discoveries. Science China Life sciences. 2013;56:201-12
13. Wishart DS, Feunang YD, Marcu A, Guo AC, Liang K, Vázquez-Fresno R. et al. HMDB 4.0: the human metabolome database for 2018. Nucleic acids research. 2018;46:D608-d17
14. Wishart DS, Mandal R, Stanislaus A, Ramirez-Gaona M. Cancer Metabolomics and the Human Metabolome Database. Metabolites. 2016 6
15. Gika H, Virgiliou C, Theodoridis G, Plumb R, Wilson I. Untargeted LC/MS-based metabolic phenotyping (metabonomics/metabolomics): The state of the art. Journal of chromatography B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences. 2019;1117:136-47
16. Zhou X, Tian C, Cao Y, Zhao M, Wang K. The role of serine metabolism in lung cancer: From oncogenesis to tumor treatment. Frontiers in genetics. 2022;13:1084609
17. Kannampuzha S, Mukherjee AG, Wanjari UR, Gopalakrishnan AV, Murali R, Namachivayam A. et al. A Systematic Role of Metabolomics, Metabolic Pathways, and Chemical Metabolism in Lung Cancer. Vaccines. 2023 11
18. Kreuzaler P, Panina Y, Segal J, Yuneva M. Adapt and conquer: Metabolic flexibility in cancer growth, invasion and evasion. Molecular metabolism. 2020;33:83-101
19. Kami K, Fujimori T, Sato H, Sato M, Yamamoto H, Ohashi Y. et al. Metabolomic profiling of lung and prostate tumor tissues by capillary electrophoresis time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Metabolomics. 2013;9:444-53
20. Shyh-Chang N. Metabolic Changes During Cancer Cachexia Pathogenesis. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2017;1026:233-49
21. Mo L, Wei B, Liang R, Yang Z, Xie S, Wu S. et al. Exploring potential biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma using LC-MS/MS metabolomics. The Journal of international medical research. 2020;48:300060519897215
22. Zhang X, Zhu X, Wang C, Zhang H, Cai Z. Non-targeted and targeted metabolomics approaches to diagnosing lung cancer and predicting patient prognosis. Oncotarget. 2016;7:63437-48
23. Puchades-Carrasco L, Jantus-Lewintre E, Pérez-Rambla C, García-García F, Lucas R, Calabuig S. et al. Serum metabolomic profiling facilitates the non-invasive identification of metabolic biomarkers associated with the onset and progression of non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:12904-16
24. Musharraf S, Mazhar S, Choudhary M, Rizi N, Atta-ur-Rahman. Plasma metabolite profiling and chemometric analyses of lung cancer along with three controls through gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Scientific reports. 2015;5:8607
25. Chen Y, Ma Z, Li A, Li H, Wang B, Zhong J. et al. Metabolomic profiling of human serum in lung cancer patients using liquid chromatography/hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology. 2015;141:705-18
26. Davidson S, Papagiannakopoulos T, Olenchock B, Heyman J, Keibler M, Luengo A. et al. Environment Impacts the Metabolic Dependencies of Ras-Driven Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cell metabolism. 2016;23:517-28
27. Hensley C, Faubert B, Yuan Q, Lev-Cohain N, Jin E, Kim J. et al. Metabolic Heterogeneity in Human Lung Tumors. Cell. 2016;164:681-94
28. Alderton G. Tumour metabolism: Feeding the TCA cycle in vivo. Nature reviews Cancer. 2016;16:198
29. Gangoiti P, Granado M, Alonso A, Goñi F, Gómez-Muñoz A. Implication of ceramide, ceramide 1-phosphate and sphingosine 1-phosphate in tumorigenesis. Translational oncogenomics. 2008;3:81-98
30. Alberg A, Armeson K, Pierce J, Bielawski J, Bielawska A, Visvanathan K. et al. Plasma sphingolipids and lung cancer: a population-based, nested case-control study. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention: a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2013;22:1374-82
31. Yu Z, Chen H, Ai J, Zhu Y, Li Y, Borgia J. et al. Global lipidomics identified plasma lipids as novel biomarkers for early detection of lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:107899-906
32. Deja S, Porebska I, Kowal A, Zabek A, Barg W, Pawelczyk K. et al. Metabolomics provide new insights on lung cancer staging and discrimination from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. 2014;100:369-80
33. Hori S, Nishiumi S, Kobayashi K, Shinohara M, Hatakeyama Y, Kotani Y. et al. A metabolomic approach to lung cancer. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2011;74:284-92
34. Long F, Su J, Liang B, Su L, Jiang S. Identification of Gene Biomarkers for Distinguishing Small-Cell Lung Cancer from Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using a Network-Based Approach. BioMed research international. 2015;2015:685303
35. Berker Y, Vandergrift L, Wagner I, Su L, Kurth J, Schuler A. et al. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy-based Metabolomic Biomarkers for Typing, Staging, and Survival Estimation of Early-Stage Human Lung Cancer. Scientific reports. 2019;9:10319
36. Fahrmann J, Grapov D, Wanichthanarak K, DeFelice B, Salemi M, Rom W. et al. Integrated Metabolomics and Proteomics Highlight Altered Nicotinamide- and Polyamine Pathways in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2017;38:271-80
37. Zhang W, Shyh-Chang N, Yang H, Rai A, Umashankar S, Ma S. et al. Glycine decarboxylase activity drives non-small cell lung cancer tumor-initiating cells and tumorigenesis. Cell. 2012;148:259-72
38. Zheng Y, He Z, Kong Y, Huang X, Zhu W, Liu Z. et al. Combined Metabolomics with Transcriptomics Reveals Important Serum Biomarkers Correlated with Lung Cancer Proliferation through a Calcium Signaling Pathway. Journal of proteome research. 2021;20:3444-54
39. You L, Fan Y, Liu X, Shao S, Guo L, Noreldeen H. et al. Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Based Tissue Metabolic Profiling Reveals Major Metabolic Pathway Alterations and Potential Biomarkers of Lung Cancer. Journal of proteome research. 2020;19:3750-60
40. Schult T, Lauer M, Berker Y, Cardoso M, Vandergrift L, Habbel P. et al. Screening human lung cancer with predictive models of serum magnetic resonance spectroscopy metabolomics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2021 118
41. Hao D, Sarfaraz MO, Farshidfar F, Bebb DG, Lee CY, Card CM. et al. Temporal characterization of serum metabolite signatures in lung cancer patients undergoing treatment. Metabolomics: Official journal of the Metabolomic Society. 2016
42. Hu J, Sun H. Serum proton NMR metabolomics analysis of human lung cancer following microwave ablation. Radiation oncology (London, England). 2018;13:40
43. Callejón-Leblic B, García-Barrera T, Grávalos-Guzmán J, Pereira-Vega A, Gómez-Ariza J. Metabolic profiling of potential lung cancer biomarkers using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and the integrated direct infusion/ gas chromatography mass spectrometry platform. Journal of Proteomics. 2016:197-206
44. Xu H, Liu R, He B, Bi C, Bi K, Li Q. Polyamine Metabolites Profiling for Characterization of Lung and Liver Cancer Using an LC-Tandem MS Method with Multiple Statistical Data Mining Strategies: Discovering Potential Cancer Biomarkers in Human Plasma and Urine. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2016 21
45. Crook AA, Powers R. Quantitative NMR-Based Biomedical Metabolomics: Current Status and Applications. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2020 25
46. Sengupta A, Weljie AM. NMR Spectroscopy-Based Metabolic Profiling of Biospecimens. Current protocols in protein science. 2019;98:e98
47. Markley JL, Brüschweiler R, Edison AS, Eghbalnia HR, Powers R, Raftery D. et al. The future of NMR-based metabolomics. Current opinion in biotechnology. 2017;43:34-40
48. Siegal G, Selenko P. Cells, drugs and NMR. Journal of magnetic resonance. 2019;306:202-12
49. Lei Z, Huhman DV, Sumner LW. Mass spectrometry strategies in metabolomics. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2011;286:25435-42
50. Lee DY, Bowen BP, Northen TR. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics, analysis of metabolite-protein interactions, and imaging. BioTechniques. 2010;49:557-65
51. Ludwig KR, Hummon AB. Mass spectrometry for the discovery of biomarkers of sepsis. Molecular bioSystems. 2017;13:648-64
52. Liang D, Liu Q, Zhou K, Jia W, Xie G, Chen T. IP4M: an integrated platform for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics data mining. BMC bioinformatics. 2020;21:444
53. Lokhov PG, Balashova EE, Trifonova OP, Maslov DL, Ponomarenko EA, Archakov AI. Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics Analysis of Obese Patients' Blood Plasma. International journal of molecular sciences. 2020 21
54. Lai Z, Tsugawa H, Wohlgemuth G, Mehta S, Mueller M, Zheng Y. et al. Identifying metabolites by integrating metabolome databases with mass spectrometry cheminformatics. Nature methods. 2018;15:53-6
55. Jang C, Chen L, Rabinowitz JD. Metabolomics and Isotope Tracing. Cell. 2018;173:822-37
56. Fiehn O. Metabolomics by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: Combined Targeted and Untargeted Profiling. Current protocols in molecular biology. 2016;114:30.4.1-4.2
57. Zheng L, Wang J, Gao W, Hu C, Wang S, Rong R. et al. GC/MS-based urine metabolomics analysis of renal allograft recipients with acute rejection. Journal of translational medicine. 2018;16:202
58. Zhou B, Xiao JF, Tuli L, Ressom HW. LC-MS-based metabolomics. Molecular bioSystems. 2012;8:470-81
59. Fang ZZ, Gonzalez FJ. LC-MS-based metabolomics: an update. Archives of toxicology. 2014;88:1491-502
60. Jiang R, Jiao Y, Xu F. Chemical derivatization-based LC-MS for metabolomics: advantages and challenges. Bioanalysis. 2016;8:1881-3
61. Gertsman I, Barshop BA. Promises and pitfalls of untargeted metabolomics. Journal of inherited metabolic disease. 2018;41:355-66
62. Schiffman C, Petrick L, Perttula K, Yano Y, Carlsson H, Whitehead T. et al. Filtering procedures for untargeted LC-MS metabolomics data. BMC bioinformatics. 2019;20:334
63. Zhang W, Ramautar R. CE-MS for metabolomics: Developments and applications in the period 2018-2020. Electrophoresis. 2020
64. Ramautar R. CE-MS in metabolomics: Status quo and the way forward. Bioanalysis. 2016 8
65. Vignoli A, Tenori L, Morsiani C, Turano P, Capri M, Luchinat C. Serum or Plasma (and Which Plasma), That Is the Question. Journal of proteome research. 2022;21:1061-72
66. Bi H, Guo Z, Jia X, Liu H, Ma L, Xue L. The key points in the pre-analytical procedures of blood and urine samples in metabolomics studies. Metabolomics. 2020;16:68
67. Moitra S, Bandyopadhyay A, Lacy P. Metabolomics of Respiratory Diseases. Handbook of experimental pharmacology. 2023;277:339-65
68. Kiseleva O, Kurbatov I, Ilgisonis E, Poverennaya E. Defining Blood Plasma and Serum Metabolome by GC-MS. Metabolites. 2021 12
69. Ruiying C, Zeyun L, Yongliang Y, Zijia Z, Ji Z, Xin T. et al. A comprehensive analysis of metabolomics and transcriptomics in non-small cell lung cancer. PloS one. 2020;15:e0232272
70. Schult TA, Lauer MJ, Berker Y, Cardoso MR, Vandergrift LA, Habbel P. et al. Screening human lung cancer with predictive models of serum magnetic resonance spectroscopy metabolomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 118
71. Li J, Liu K, Ji Z, Wang Y, Yin T, Long T. et al. Serum untargeted metabolomics reveal metabolic alteration of non-small cell lung cancer and refine disease detection. Cancer Sci. 2023;114:680-9
72. Guo L, Li L, Xu Z, Meng F, Guo H, Liu P. et al. Metabolic network-based identification of plasma markers for non-small cell lung cancer. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2021;413:7421-30
73. Peng F, Liu Y, He C, Kong Y, Ouyang Q, Xie X. et al. Prediction of platinum-based chemotherapy efficacy in lung cancer based on LC-MS metabolomics approach. Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis. 2018: 95.
74. Sarlinova M, Baranovicova E, Skalicanova M, Dzian A, Petras M, Lehotsky J. et al. Metabolomic profiling of blood plasma of patients with lung cancer and malignant tumors with metastasis in the lungs showed similar features and promising statistical discrimination against controls. Neoplasma. 2021
75. Cao P, Wu S, Guo W, Zhang Q, Gong W, Li Q. et al. Precise pathological classification of non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma based on an integrated platform of targeted metabolome and lipidome. Metabolomics. 2021;17:98
76. Scriver Charles, R. A simple phenylalanine method for detecting. Pediatrics. 1998;102:236 -
77. Guthrie RE, Susi AA. A simple Phenylalanine Method for Detecting Phenylketonuria in Lare Populations of New Born Infants. Pediatrics. 1963;32:338-43
78. Tobin NH, Murphy A, Li F, Brummel SS, Taha TE, Saidi F. et al. Comparison of dried blood spot and plasma sampling for untargeted metabolomics. Metabolomics. 2021;17:62
79. Malsagova K, Kopylov A, Stepanov A, Butkova T, Izotov A, Kaysheva A. Dried Blood Spot in Laboratory: Directions and Prospects. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2020 10
80. Ferreira HB, Guerra IMS, Melo T, Rocha H, Moreira ASP, Paiva A. et al. Dried blood spots in clinical lipidomics: optimization and recent findings. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2022;414:7085-101
81. Chepyala D, Kuo HC, Su KY, Liao HW, Wang SY, Chepyala SR. et al. Improved Dried Blood Spot-Based Metabolomics Analysis by a Postcolumn Infused-Internal Standard Assisted Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Method. Analytical chemistry. 2019;91:10702-12
82. Yu L, Li KF, Li XM, Guan C, Sun TT, Zhang XY. Metabolomic profiling of dried blood spots reveals gender-specific discriminant models for the diagnosis of small cell lung cancer. Aging-Us. 2020;12:978-95
83. Hernandes VV, Barbas C, Dudzik D. A review of blood sample handling and pre-processing for metabolomics studies. Electrophoresis. 2017
84. Raúl G-D, lvaro G-D, Ana S, ngeles F-R. Recommendations and Best Practices for Standardizing the Pre-Analytical Processing of Blood and Urine Samples in Metabolomics. Metabolites. 2020. 2020 10
85. Yu M, Sun R, Zhao Y, Shao F, Zhu W, Aa J. Detection and verification of coexisting diagnostic markers in plasma and serum of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Future oncology (London, England). 2021;17:4355-69
86. Tuck MK, Chan DW, Chia D, Godwin AK, Brenner DE. Standard Operating Procedures for Serum and Plasma Collection: Early Detection Research Network Consensus Statement Standard Operating Procedure Integration Working Group. Journal of proteome research. 2009;8:113-7
87. Denery J, Nunes A, Dickerson T. Characterization of differences between blood sample matrices in untargeted metabolomics. Analytical chemistry. 2011;83:1040-7
88. Barri T, Dragsted L. UPLC-ESI-QTOF/MS and multivariate data analysis for blood plasma and serum metabolomics: effect of experimental artefacts and anticoagulant. Analytica chimica acta. 2013;768:118-28
89. Yu Z, Kastenmüller G, He Y, Belcredi P, Wang-Sattler R. Differences between Human Plasma and Serum Metabolite Profiles. PloS one. 2011;6:e21230
90. Xinyu Liu, Miriam Hoene, Xiaolin Wang. et al. Serum or plasma, what is the difference? Investigations to facilitate the sample material selection decision making process for metabolomics studies and beyond. Analytica chimica acta. 2018
91. Beate Kamlage, Sandra González, Maldonado Bianca. et al. Quality markers addressing preanalytical variations of blood and plasma processing identified by broad and targeted metabolite profiling. Clinical chemistry. 2014
92. Goldberg E, Ievari-Shariati S, Kidane B, Kim J, Banerji S, Qing G. et al. Comparative metabolomics studies of blood collected in streck and heparin tubes from lung cancer patients. PloS one. 2021;16:e0249648
93. Kennedy AD, Ford L, Wittmann B, Conner J, Wulff J, Mitchell M. et al. Global biochemical analysis of plasma, serum and whole blood collected using various anticoagulant additives. PloS one. 2021;16:e0249797
94. Dinges SS, Hohm A, Vandergrift LA, Nowak J, Habbel P, Kaltashov IA. et al. Cancer metabolomic markers in urine: evidence, techniques and recommendations. Nature reviews Urology. 2019;16:339-62
95. Burton C, Ma Y. Current Trends in Cancer Biomarker Discovery Using Urinary Metabolomics: Achievements and New Challenges. Current medicinal chemistry. 2019;26:5-28
96. Mathé EA, Patterson AD, Haznadar M, Manna SK, Krausz KW, Bowman ED. et al. Noninvasive urinary metabolomic profiling identifies diagnostic and prognostic markers in lung cancer. Cancer research. 2014;74:3259-70
97. Seow WJ, Shu XO, Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Walker DI, Hu W. et al. Association of Untargeted Urinary Metabolomics and Lung Cancer Risk Among Never-Smoking Women in China. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e1911970
98. Zhao C, Kong X, Han S, Li X, Wu T, Zhou J. et al. Analysis of differential metabolites in lung cancer patients based on metabolomics and bioinformatics. Future Oncol. 2020;16:1269-87
99. Ahmed N, Kidane B, Wang L, Nugent Z, Moldovan N, McElrea A. et al. Metabolic Changes in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients after Surgical Resection. Cancers (Basel). 2021 13
100. Sugimoto M. Salivary metabolomics for cancer detection. Expert review of proteomics. 2020;17:639-48
101. Kaczor-Urbanowicz KE, Martin Carreras-Presas C, Aro K, Tu M, Garcia-Godoy F, Wong DT. Saliva diagnostics - Current views and directions. Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, NJ). 2017;242:459-72
102. Nijakowski K, Zdrojewski J, Nowak M, Gruszczyński D, Knoll F, Surdacka A. Salivary Metabolomics for Systemic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review. Metabolites. 2022 13
103. Jiang X, Chen X, Chen Z, Yu J, Lou H, Wu J. High-Throughput Salivary Metabolite Profiling on an Ultralow Noise Tip-Enhanced Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry Platform for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Early Lung Cancer. Journal of proteome research. 2021;20:4346-56
104. Takamori S, Ishikawa S, Suzuki J, Oizumi H, Uchida T, Ueda S. et al. Differential diagnosis of lung cancer and benign lung lesion using salivary metabolites: A preliminary study. Thorac Cancer. 2022;13:460-5
105. Amann A, Costello B, Miekisch W, Schubert J, Buszewski B, Pleil J. et al. The human volatilome: volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath, skin emanations, urine, feces and saliva. Journal of Breath Research. 2014;8:034001
106. Pauling L. Correction: Quantitative Analysis of Urine Vapor and Breath by Gas-Liquid Partition Chromatography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1972
107. Sakumura Y, Koyama Y, Tokutake H, Hida T, Sato K, Itoh T. et al. Diagnosis by Volatile Organic Compounds in Exhaled Breath from Lung Cancer Patients Using Support Vector Machine Algorithm. Sensors. 2017;17:12
108. Kalkanis A, Papadopoulos D, Testelmans D, Kopitopoulou A, Boeykens E, Wauters E. Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid-Isolated Biomarkers for the Diagnostic and Prognostic Assessment of Lung Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2022 12
109. Elpa DP, Chiu HY, Wu SP, Urban PL. Skin Metabolomics. Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM. 2021;32:66-75
110. Dutkiewicz EP, Urban PL. Quantitative mass spectrometry of unconventional human biological matrices. Philosophical transactions Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences. 2016 374
111. Delgado-Povedano MM, Calderón-Santiago M, Luque de Castro MD, Priego-Capote F. Metabolomics analysis of human sweat collected after moderate exercise. Talanta. 2018;177:47-65
112. Dutkiewicz EP, Hsieh KT, Wang YS, Chiu HY, Urban PL. Hydrogel Micropatch and Mass Spectrometry-Assisted Screening for Psoriasis-Related Skin Metabolites. Clinical chemistry. 2016;62:1120-8
113. Dutkiewicz EP, Chiu HY, Urban PL. Micropatch-arrayed pads for non-invasive spatial and temporal profiling of topical drugs on skin surface. Journal of mass spectrometry: JMS. 2015;50:1321-5
114. Calderón-Santiago M, Priego-Capote F, Turck N, Robin X, Jurado-Gámez B, Sanchez JC. et al. Human sweat metabolomics for lung cancer screening. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015;407:5381-92
115. Zang X, Zhang J, Jiao P, Xue X, Lv Z. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Detection and Subtyping by UPLC-HRMS-Based Tissue Metabolomics. Journal of proteome research. 2022;21:2011-22
116. Chen W, Lu S, Wang G, Chen F, Bai C. Staging research of human lung cancer tissues by high-resolution magic angle spinning proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (HRMAS H NMR) and multivariate data analysis. Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology. 2017;13:e232-e8
117. Maruyama A, Kami K, Sasaki K, Sato H, Sato Y, Tsuchihara K. et al. Extraction of Aqueous Metabolites from Cultured Adherent Cells for Metabolomic Analysis by Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry. Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2019
118. Ahmed N, Kidane B, Wang L, Qing G, Tan L, Buduhan G. et al. Non-invasive exploration of metabolic profile of lung cancer with Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Mass Spectrometry. Contemporary clinical trials communications. 2019;16:100445
119. Guo L, Li L, Xu Z, Meng F, Guo H, Liu P. et al. Metabolic network-based identification of plasma markers for non-small cell lung cancer. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry. 2021;413:7421-30
120. Cao P, Wu S, Guo W, Zhang Q, Gong W, Li Q. et al. Precise pathological classification of non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma based on an integrated platform of targeted metabolome and lipidome. Metabolomics: Official journal of the Metabolomic Society. 2021;17:98
121. Menyhárt O, Győrffy B. Multi-omics approaches in cancer research with applications in tumor subtyping, prognosis, and diagnosis. Computational and structural biotechnology journal. 2021;19:949-60
122. Seow W, Shu X, Nicholson J, Holmes E, Walker D, Hu W. et al. Association of Untargeted Urinary Metabolomics and Lung Cancer Risk Among Never-Smoking Women in China. JAMA network open. 2019;2:e1911970
123. Lokhov P, Trifonova O, Maslov D, Archakov A. Blood plasma metabolites and the risk of developing lung cancer in Russia. European journal of cancer prevention: the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP). 2013;22:335-41
124. Liang T, Li R, Mai C, Guan X, Li J, Wang X. et al. A method establishment and comparison of in vivo lung cancer model development platforms for evaluation of tumour metabolism and pharmaceutical efficacy. Phytomedicine: international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology. 2022;96:153831
125. Gao H, Song Y, Ma J, Zhai J, Zhang Y, Qu X. Untargeted metabolomics analysis of omeprazole-enhanced chemosensitivity to cisplatin in mice with non-small cell lung cancer. Chemico-biological interactions. 2022;360:109933
126. Qi S, Wu Q, Chen Z, Zhang W, Zhou Y, Mao K. et al. High-resolution metabolomic biomarkers for lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Scientific reports. 2021;11:11805
127. Tang Y, Li Z, Lazar L, Fang Z, Tang C, Zhao J. Metabolomics workflow for lung cancer: Discovery of biomarkers. Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry. 2019;495:436-45
128. Sarlinova M, Baranovicova E, Skalicanova M, Dzian A, Petras M, Lehotsky J. et al. Metabolomic profiling of blood plasma of patients with lung cancer and malignant tumors with metastasis in the lungs showed similar features and promising statistical discrimination against controls. Neoplasma. 2021;68:852-60
129. Zheng J, Zheng Y, Li W, Zhi J, Huang X, Zhu W. et al. Combined metabolomics with transcriptomics reveals potential plasma biomarkers correlated with non-small-cell lung cancer proliferation through the Akt pathway. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2022;530:66-73
130. Shen J, Sun N, Zens P, Kunzke T, Buck A, Prade VM. et al. Spatial metabolomics for evaluating response to neoadjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Communications. 2022;42:517-35
131. Neumann J, Freitag H, Hartmann J, Niehaus K, Galanis M, Griesshammer M. et al. Subtyping non-small cell lung cancer by histology-guided spatial metabolomics. Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology. 2022;148:351-60
Corresponding author: Rong Yu, email: yurongedu.cn; Huaichao Luo, email: luo1987cccom.