Int J Med Sci 2022; 19(13):1856-1863. doi:10.7150/ijms.72299 This issue Cite

Research Paper

On-site Ultrasound Screens out Asymptomatic Knee Lesions in Elite Adolescent Male Basketball Players

Chan-Shien Ho, MD1,2*, Tung-Yang Yu, MD, PhD3,4*, Chien-Hung Chen, MD2,3, Yin-Chou Lin, MD, PhD2,5,6, Wen-Chung Tsai, MD, PhD2,4,5 Corresponding address

1. Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
2. Center of Comprehensive Sports Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
4. College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
5. Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
6. Open University of Kaohsiung, Center for General Education, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
*The two authors have contributed equally as co-first authors.

Ho CS, Yu TY, Chen CH, Lin YC, Tsai WC. On-site Ultrasound Screens out Asymptomatic Knee Lesions in Elite Adolescent Male Basketball Players. Int J Med Sci 2022; 19(13):1856-1863. doi:10.7150/ijms.72299.
Other styles

File import instruction


Graphic abstract

Basketball is a popular sport worldwide with a high injury risk. In this study, we conducted survey composed of clinical symptom reporting scale, physical examination and meticulous portable musculoskeletal ultrasound to 19 elite male high school basketball players and 15 regular male high school students. Our study showed the incidence of ultrasonographic findings of any lesion, suprapatellar effusion and proximal patellar tendinopathy is significantly higher in player group, and the incidence of asymptomatic ultrasonographic lesion is also higher in player group. Screening for asymptomatic lesions bares clinical relevance and plays a role in prevention of symptom development. With the concise and easy-to-perform ultrasonography protocol we performed and being interpreted by sports team physician, the protocol can offer precise diagnosis of common injury and screening for asymptomatic lesion potentially progressive.

Keywords: basketball, injury, ultrasonography, elite, adolescent, patellar tendon, effusion, prevention


Basketball is a popular sport worldwide, but also it is a sport with high injury risk. According to a previous report, the incidence of injury is 24.7 events per 1000 playing-hours, a higher incidence compared to other sports [1]. It may be due to the character of high intensity and high chance of body-contact between players. The lower limb movements of offensive players include frequent accelerating, decelerating, changing in direction, cutting, jumping and body contact. On the other hand, defensive players also exert to do the movements mentioned above, and even more lateral movement is needed to play defense. High strength, agility, speed and power are required to successfully doing these movements, and they exert a high stress to lower extremities of basketball players [2]. According to previous research done to high school varsity basketball players, ankle is the most frequently injured body parts and followed by knee in both male and female student players [3, 4]. Although warm up activities might reduce general lower-extremity injuries in basketball players [5] and review has pointed out the importance and effectiveness of preventive programs for anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL) prevention [6], more study is still needed to formulate injury prevention programs for basketball players to prevent other knee injuries [7]. There are several common knee disorders other than ACL injury met by adolescent athletes, such as patellar tendinopathy [8], Osgood-Schlatter disease (OSD), quadriceps tendinopathy [9], iliotibial band (ITB) syndrome [10], medial collateral ligament, lateral collateral ligament and meniscus [11].

Non-invasive screening such as physical examinations, anthropometric indices and balance testing were incorporated to screen for possible risk factors for lower limb injury [12], but still there is no a single best method. Ultrasonography is a mature clinical tool for real-time imaging soft tissue such as muscle, tendon, ligament and even peripheral nerve and robust research has proven its validity compared with golden standard of diagnosis [13-16]. When it comes to sideline sports medicine, soft tissue ultrasonography bares advantages of high safety, non-radiative, highly portable, relatively cheap in price and the ability to allow dynamic testing at the field. For many common knee disorders mentioned above, research has shown good sensitivity and excellent specificity of ultrasonographic diagnosis confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [17]. Although recent study demonstrated excellent precision of ultrasonography as compared to MRI in the diagnosis of ACL and PCL tears and serve as immediate diagnosis in patients with acute knee trauma [18], we did not include ACL/PCL screening in our protocol since these injury is less likely to be “unknown” because of the injury almost always occur in an acute scenario. The results of previous study showed that, as part of a precareer screening tool, ultrasonography can provide valuable information for determining relative risk of noncontact injuries diagnosed during a 5-year playing career in collegiate American football players in the setting of a prospective longitudinal study [19]. A cross sectional comprehensive ultrasonography scanning can not only act a screening for potential injury, but also establish baseline for follow-up study.

By incorporating physical examination, symptom-related scoring scale and knee ultrasonography protocol, we investigated a team of elite high school male basketball player and age-matched control group to delineate the picture of knee injury in this specific studied group.

Materials and Methods

We enrolled two groups of high-school male students. For the high injury risk group, 19 elite high-school male basketball league players in Taiwan were enrolled, and 15 high school male students with no regular basketball training and no history of sports injury of knee were enrolled as control group. We viewed bilateral knee of a single subject as two independent knees, thus all quantitative data is recorded for both knees. Data collection was completed between September 2019 and August 2021. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan (#201901232B0) and written, informed consent was obtained from all participating subjects.

Basic data of subjects

The age, height, body weight, formal training time weekly and time trained as basketball player were recorded.

Symptoms of knee

For evaluation for symptoms of knee, we employed International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) published by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) [20]. IKDC was established in 1987, and the aim of its establishment is to develop a standardized international documentation system for knee surgery. The “IKDC-Standard Knee Evaluation Form” was published in 1993, and later in 2000, the “IKDC-subjective knee form” (IKDC-SKF) was published. The IKDC-SKF is used in this study due to its property of patient-reported outcome that measures patient's subjective perception of symptoms, function, and symptom-related sports activity and being a knee-specific, rather than disease-specific. The IKDC-SKF questionnaire is composed of 18 items and the possible item score sums up to 87 points. A fully-scored IKDC-SKF represents no impairment and a high participation level perceived by the subject [21]. The questions on IKDC-SKF were asked by one of the authors (C.S. Ho) for every enrolled subjects.

Physical Examination of knee

The physical examination conducted included passive range of motion (PROM) with range of flexion and extension measured with goniometry to screening for any ROM loss. The physical examination was conducted by one of the authors (C.S. Ho).

Ultrasound examination of knee

We employed qualitative and quantitative methods of ultrasonography for knee examination. The BenQ T3300 portable ultrasound equipped with BenQ L154B (4-15 MHz) linear array probe was used in this study. We examined three views of knee (anterior, medial, lateral) and screened for effusion, ligaments sprain, tendinopathy, bony lesions or any possible lesions generally followed previous report [18]. Also, the thickness of distal quadriceps tendon, proximal and distal patellar tendon, distal iliotibial band at insertion to Gerdy's tubercle of tibia and medial collateral ligament at medial joint line were acquired for analysis. (For detail description of ultrasonography examination protocol, please refer to supplementary information.) The ultrasonography examination of knee was performed by all the authors (W.C. Tsai, T.Y. Yu, C.H. Chen and C.S. Ho) following examination protocol, and the performers were blinded to the result of IKDC-SKF and physical examinations. The ultrasonographic images were exported after examinations were done and measurement of thickness was conducted by one of the authors (C.S. Ho), who was blinded to the result of IKDC-SKF and physical examinations during the measuring process.

Statistics analysis

The scores of IKDC-SKF score between the player and control group, and the subgroup analysis for groups with positive and negative ultrasonography examination findings were compared by unpaired t-test. The results of physical examination between player and control groups were analyzed by unpaired t-test. The incidence of positive physical examination and the incidence of positive ultrasonography lesions between player and control groups were analyzed by Fisher's exact test. The thickness of measured structures of basketball player group and control group was compared with unpaired t-test. A P<0.05 is considered statistically significant.


We interviewed 19 male high-school basketball players and 15 male non-basketball player high-school students and completed physical examination, IKDC-SKF and ultrasonographic screening. Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. The height of player group is significantly higher than control group (180.89±6.42 cm vs 171.51±5.97 cm, P<0.01). Also, the time trained as basketball player (4.47±2.14 years vs 0.00±0.00 years, P<0.01) and the time of weekly training (33.16±4.48 hours/week vs 0.00±0.00 hours/week, P<0.01) are significantly higher in player group. The age (17.37±0.76 years vs 17.67±1.18 years, P=0.38) and bodyweight (68.47±5.60 kg vs 69.01±13.34 kg P=0.87) showed no difference in the two surveyed groups. The result of physical examination and scores of IKDC-SKF is shown in Table 2. The physical examination revealed that passive knee flexion range of motion is higher in player group (125.90±10.35 degrees vs 115.6±10.52 degrees, P<0.01), with no difference in passive extension range of motion (0.00±0.00 degree vs 0.20±0.76 degree P=0.16). Scores of IKDC-SKF are significantly lower in player group compared with control group in both total scale (77.29±14.20 vs 86.13±2.65, P<0.01) and the subscale with sports-related questions (37.74±4.38 vs 39.80±0.81, P=0.01).

The result of ultrasonography examination (Table 3) showed significantly higher incidence of at least one positive findings among player groups compared with control group [28 (73.68%) vs 2 (6.67%), P<0.01] and also the incidence of at least one ultrasonographic finding among all screened areas [40/266 (15.04%) vs 2/210 (0.95%), P<0.01]. In all identified lesions in ultrasonography, the incidence of suprapatellar recess effusion [21 (55.26%) vs 0 (0.00%) P<0.01] and patellar tendon lesions [6 (15.79%) vs 0 (0.00%), P=0.03] are higher in player groups (Examples of ultrasonographic findings were shown in Figure 1). There was no difference in the incidence of medial collateral ligament lesions [6 (15.79%) vs 1 (3.33%), P=0.12], tibial tuberosity apophysitis [3 (7.89%) vs 1 (3.33%), P=0.62], lesions at iliotibial band insertion [2 (5.26%) vs 0 (0.00%), P=0.50] or distal quadriceps tendon lesions [2 (5.26%) vs 0 (0.00%), P=0.50]. There was no evidence of lateral collateral ligament injury in both the players and control group subjects. We also found out that in players and control group subjects, the incidence of positive ultrasonography lesion is significantly higher [68% (13/19) vs 4% (1/25), P<0.01] in player group. For the subgroup analysis of player group, the scores of IKDC-SKF with positive (n=26) and negative ultrasonography examination findings were compared and the result showed no difference between these groups (IKDC-SKF score 75.31±2.94 vs 81.58±3.39, P=0.21).

 Table 1 

Characteristics of high-school basketball players and non-basketball players (N=34)

Player groupControl groupP
Subjects (Number)1915
Age (year-old)17.37±0.7617.67±1.180.38
Height (centimeter)180.89±6.42171.51±5.97<0.01***
Bodyweight (kilogram)68.47±5.6069.01±13.340.87
Time trained as basketball player (years)4.47±2.140.00±0.00<0.01***
Formal training time (hours/week)33.16±4.480.00±0.00<0.01***

*P<0.05, ** P<0.01, ***P<0.001, unpaired t-test.

 Table 2 

The result of physical examination and IKDC-SKF score

Player groupControl groupP
Knee (number)3830
Knee flexion (degree)125.90±10.35115.6±10.52<0.01***
Knee extension (degree)0.00±0.000.20±0.760.16
IKDC-SKFTotal scorea (Max.= 87)77.29±14.2086.13±2.65<0.01**
Sports subscaleb (Max.= 40)37.74±4.3839.80±0.810.01*

aThe total score of the IKDC-SKF is the original item score from the sum of all items in IKDC-SKF.

bThe sport subscale is composed of question #8 and #9, which are sports activities related questions located in the page 2 of IKDC-SKF and the sum of all items is 40.

Max.: Maximum, *P<0.05, ** P<0.01, ***P<0.001, unpaired t-test.

 Figure 1 

Common ultrasonographic findings of knee in surveyed athletes. (a) Effusion of suprapatellar recess. Hypoechoic area (arrow) is noticed in the extent of suprapatellar recess and the findings is suggestive of suprapatellar recess effusion. (b) Patellar tendinopathy. Focal hypoechoic change and swelling of proximal tendon is noticed. The normal fibrillar pattern of echogenicity is disrupted (dotted arrow) (c) Tibial tuberosity apophysitis. A separated bone fragment (asterisk) apart from tibia bone is noticed, and power doppler shows increased signals, which is suggestive of inflammatory process. Abbreviations: QT: quadriceps tendon, F: femur, P: patella, arrow: effusion, PT: patellar tendon, T: tibia.

Int J Med Sci Image

(View in new window)

 Table 3 

Findings of knee ultrasonography

Player groupControl groupP
Number of subjects presented with any ultrasonographic finding28 (73.68%)2 (6.67%)<0.01***
Numbers of ultrasonographic findings in all screened structure†40/266(15.04%)2/210(0.95%)<0.01***
Suprapatellar recess effusion21 (55.26%)0 (0.00%)<0.01***
Patellar tendon lesions6 (15.79%)0 (0.00%)0.03*
Medial collateral ligament lesions6 (15.79%)1 (3.33%)0.12
Tibial tuberosity apophysitis (Osgood-Schlatter Disease)3 (7.89%)1 (3.33%)0.62
Lesions at iliotibial band insertion2 (5.26%)0 (0.00%)0.50
Distal quadriceps tendon lesions2 (5.26%)0 (0.00%)0.50
Lateral collateral ligament lesions0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)-

†Seven areas were screened for potential lesions.

*P<0.05, ** P<0.01, ***P<0.001, Fisher's exact test.

 Table 4 

Thickness of measured knee structures under ultrasonography

Player groupControl groupP
Knee (number)3830
Distal quadriceps tendon (mm)5.30±1.025.36±0.810.77
Proximal patellar tendon (mm)3.78±1.203.88±0.750.70
Distal patellar tendon (mm)4.16±0.723.52±0.53<0.01***
Distal iliotibial band (mm)3.16±0.673.53±0.580.02*
Medial collateral ligament (mm)3.01±0.652.76±0.690.09

*P<0.05, ** P<0.01, ***P<0.001, unpaired t-test.

The measurements of thickness for five structures of knee in ultrasonography (Table 4) showed significant difference in thickness of distal patellar tendons [4.16±0.72 mm vs 3.52±0.53 mm, P<0.01] and distal iliotibial bands [3.16±0.67 mm vs 3.53±0.58 mm, P=0.02] between player group and control group, with no difference in thickness of distal quadriceps tendons [5.30±1.02 vs 5.36±0.81, P=0.77], proximal patellar tendons [3.78±1.20 vs 3.88±0.75, P=0.70] and medial collateral ligaments [3.01±0.65 vs 2.76±0.69, P=0.09].


There are several common knee disorders met by adolescent athlete. Patellar tendinopathy has been shown to be related to jumping sports due to the repetitive stress of the extensor mechanism [8], and its prevalence is considered to be higher in male youth athlete [22]. Osgood-Schlatter disease (OSD) is a painful disorder as a structural answer to repeated biomechanical stress due to acute and/or chronic overload to the tibial tuberosity apophysis in adolescent athlete, and it affects mainly adolescent boys active in football and basketball players [23]. Quadriceps tendinopathy may result from repetitive high-intensity knee extension especially during high force-generating movement such as jumping. If not properly addressed, tendinosis might progress to partial tear or even complete rupture in extreme circumstances [9]. Iliotibial band (ITB) syndrome is a very common cause of lateral knee pain in runners [10], although less commonly met, ITB syndrome can also disturb basketball players. Other injury such as medial collateral ligament, lateral collateral ligament, meniscus and chondral injury were also reported and their rates vary across gender and levels of competition [11].

In previous study, collegiate basketball players with asymptomatic knees screened with MRI showed an incidence of 74% having at least one abnormal finding. Most common abnormalities included bone marrow edema (41%), articular cartilage abnormality (41%), joint effusion (35%), and patellar tendon signal abnormality (24%) [24]. Height of the players is an effective screening tools for general knee injury mentioned in one review [12], however, subgroup analysis of injured and uninjured group players failed to show this result. Although the incidence of injury and height are both higher in players group, this might be biased due to the fact that basketball players are apparently taller than general population.

For specific ultrasonographic findings, the incidence of suprapatellar recess effusion was 55.26% and significantly higher than in control group (0.00%). Although ultrasonographic findings, including suprapatellar effusion, popliteal cyst, pes anserinus bursitis, suprapatellar tendinitis, were shown to be significantly correlated with pain intensity in knee osteoarthritis patients [25], no relationship between symptom and knee effusion alone was reported. Additional analysis of our data was done among player groups, which showed no difference of IKDC-SKF score between ultrasonographic effusion positive and negative knees of players (77.82 vs 76.56, P=0.77, unpaired t-test). Also, in a longitudinal follow-up study of collegiate American football players by Lewis et al., there was no higher likelihood for developing knee injury in a 5-year career duration with effusion noted on pre-career ultrasonography screening [19].

The incidence of patellar tendinopathy of player group was 15.79% (6 knees) but only one knee was reported to be symptomatic (IKDC score 49), which indicated that most patellar tendinopathy revealed by ultrasonography in this group is asymptomatic. Fazekas et al. surveyed 31 collegiate athletes involved in jumping movement, 13 of them were male and 9 knees were tested positive of ultrasonographic findings of patellar tendinopathy, but the correlation of positive image findings with the scoring of Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment Questionnaire for Patellar Tendinopathy (VISA-P) was poor and insignificant [26]. Our investigation also showed similar result. In previous study of Cook et al., in teenager basketball player aged 14-18 years, if asymptomatic patellar tendinosis is noticed in ultrasonography, there is 30% chance that symptoms will develop in the future, which is significantly higher compared with those who have normal ultrasonographic appearance (9%) [27] and Lewis et al. also revealed that there was a significantly higher likelihood of patellar tendon injury based on the presence of patellar tendon ultrasonographic pathology and the odds ratio was 11 [19]. These findings made screening of asymptomatic patellar tendinopathy clinically relevant due to the impact on basketball player when it becomes symptomatic. Study also showed that symptomatic patellar tendinopathy is influential to normal foot and ankle alignment, ankle mobility, ITB mobility, hip internal and external rotatory mobility and hip abductor strength [28]. For MCL injury, in a previous survey of American high school athletes, there were 11 out of 144 (7.64%) investigated male basketball players having MCL injury [11]. The MCL injury was defined positive when athletic trainer reported at the filed or registered in injury reporting system by medical faculties in this study. In our survey, the incidence of ultrasonographic MCL lesion is not significantly higher (15.79%), of which two (5.36%) were reported to be symptomatic. The incidence of tibial tuberosity apophysitis (Osgood-Schlatter disease, OSD) is 7.89%, a higher incidence compared with the work of Foss et al. In their study of American high school basketball players, 4.1% among 122 tested subjects had OSD. A huge difference was noticed that Sinding-Larsen-Johansson Syndrome, which was not found in our survey, was reported to be 3.7% in their survey. A Japanese study showed that the incidence of OSD has a trend of yearly increase during 10 to 14 years old in teenaged male athletes, and the incidence is higher after the secondary ossification center is mature [29]. The incidence of OSD is not high, and although it is a self-limiting disease, it can still be prevented by balancing the strength of quadricep and hamstring muscles and adequate stretching. Also, early recognition with proper resting, anti-inflammation measures and physical therapy can lead to good outcome [30]. These suggest that screening for OSD is clinically relevant when it comes to high school athletes. There was no distal QT pathology revealed in our studied subjects. However, the screening of QT lesions is still clinically relevant. Lewis et al. showed that there was a significantly higher likelihood of quadriceps musculotendinous injury based on the presence of QT ultrasonographic pathology and the odd ratio were shown to be 140 [19].

There was a tested player reporting relatively low IKDC-SKF score with 49 out of 87 and no definite ultrasonographic abnormality was revealed under our ultrasonography examination protocol. This might be explained by that the subject could have knee disorder that cannot be well-detected by ultrasonography [18]. Meniscal injury can be revealed in ultrasonography by noticing visible tear, defined as linear hypoechoic deficit along meniscus, or indirect signs such as parameniscal cyst and massive effusion [31]. The diagnostic value of ultrasonography on meniscal injury increased due to the improvement in ultrasonographic resolution with high-frequency probe. A review suggests that ultrasonography with a high-frequency linear probe is an acceptable imaging modality in evaluating meniscal tears [32], however, there is still some pitfalls in evaluation of meniscus by ultrasonography, such as poorer accuracy of diagnostic values of lateral meniscus injury than medial meniscus [33]. Another reason that correlation of IKDC-SKR with ultrasonography findings was inferior in this tested subject might be not including cartilage scanning in our ultrasonography protocol. Lesions in the patellofemoral cartilage were more commonly observed than those in the femorotibial joint and elevated intrameniscal signal was documented in 20% of subjects examined by MRI, chiefly in the medial meniscus [24]. It is reasonable since patellofemoral lesion and deep meniscal lesion are difficult to detect using ultrasonography. Novel techniques taking knee articular motion into consideration was shown to be more valid to significantly decrease false-negative diagnoses compared with fixed-angle transverse scanning [34] and it can be considered to be incorporated in future work. Also in previous study, ultrasonography has a very poor sensitivity for diagnosing patellar cartilage defect, which was reported to be 0 [17] and this pathology can also cause symptoms of knee derangement [35] and affect sports activity. These might explain the inferior correlation of IKDC-SKR with ultrasonography findings in this tested subject. On the other hand, we found that in player and control group subjects, the incidence of positive ultrasonography lesion is significantly higher in the player group. It has clinical relevance that in those elite high school basketball players, asymptomatic lesion could be identified via on-site ultrasonography easily and addressed earlier to prevent symptoms development, and decrease the negative impact on training and competition.

There are some limitations of our study. First, although ultrasonography is proved to be reliable in diagnosing and screening for knee injuries, ultrasonography examination is still an operator-dependent image modality. The clinical value of ultrasonography data is based on good image quality and interpretation. Our study was designed to standardize the ultrasonography protocol, and further investigation of intra- and inter-operator reliability of this protocol is needed. Also, the diagnostic value might also vary when different ultrasonography machines are used. We apply portable ultrasonography examination modality so as to serve these players on-site, and the sensitivity of screening can be influenced by the limitation of image resolution using portable machines, and further study can be conducted to compare the difference. Second, the athletes tested positive of ultrasonographic findings were not further examined with other modality such as MRI or direct operation vision. Since conservative or ultrasonography-guided injection therapy is effective in these pathologies, advanced image modality and surgery is not done in the studied group. Last but not least, relatively small sample size in both player and control groups were included and larger sample size examined with the same protocol might be needed to give a more robust result.

In conclusion, following an easy-to-perform, brief and precise on-site meticulous musculoskeletal ultrasonography screening protocol, our study showed similar incidence of common knee injury to previous survey conducted to larger cohort. The protocol can offer preliminary impression of common knee injury the athlete encounter and screening for asymptomatic lesion, which ultimately can benefit the welfare of elite male high school basketball players. Future work can be focused on the longitudinal follow-up of our studied cohort and try to establish predictive value of findings in current proposal.


The findings we shown suggest that on-site ultrasonography can be used to not only diagnose knee lesion but also screen for asymptomatic knee lesion. Our investigation showed potential impact on symptom and injury prevention since we found that in asymptomatic subjects, the incidence of positive ultrasonographic lesion is significantly higher in the player group. It has clinical relevance that in those elite high school basketball players, asymptomatic lesion could be identified via on-site ultrasonography easily and addressed earlier to prevent symptoms development, and decrease the negative impact on training and competition.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary figures and information.



This project is funded by Chang-Gung memorial hospital (Grant Numbers: CMRPG5J0171, CMRPG5J0172).

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.


1. McKay G, Goldie P, Payne W, Oakes B, Watson L. A prospective study of injuries in basketball: a total profile and comparison by gender and standard of competition. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2001;4:196-211

2. Newman JS, Newberg AH. Basketball injuries. Radiologic Clinics. 2010;48:1095-111

3. Gender-Specific Injury Patterns in High School Varsity Basketball. Journal of Women's Health. 1992; 1: 69-76.

4. Allahabadi S, Su F, Lansdown DA. Systematic Review of Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Injuries and Treatment Outcomes in Women's National Basketball Association and National Basketball Association Players. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9:2325967120982076

5. Davis AC, Emptage NP, Pounds D, Woo D, Sallis R, Romero MG. et al. The Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Warmups for Lower Extremity Injury Prevention in Basketball: A Systematic Review. Sports Med Open. 2021;7:67

6. Herman K, Barton C, Malliaras P, Morrissey D. The effectiveness of neuromuscular warm-up strategies, that require no additional equipment, for preventing lower limb injuries during sports participation: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2012;10:75

7. DiFiori JP, Gullich A, Brenner JS, Cote J, Hainline B, Ryan E 3rd. et al. The NBA and Youth Basketball: Recommendations for Promoting a Healthy and Positive Experience. Sports Med. 2018;48:2053-65

8. Figueroa D, Figueroa F, Calvo R. Patellar Tendinopathy: Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24:e184-e92

9. Dauty M, Menu P, Garraud T, Mesland O, Berlivet T, Metayer B. et al. Jumper's knee mechanical consequences in professional basketball players: the "Camel's Back curve". Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019;119:735-42

10. Strauss EJ, Kim S, Calcei JG, Park D. Iliotibial Band Syndrome: Evaluation and Management. JAAOS - Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2011 19

11. Stanley LE, Kerr ZY, Dompier TP, Padua DA. Sex Differences in the Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Medial Collateral Ligament, and Meniscal Injuries in Collegiate and High School Sports: 2009-2010 Through 2013-2014. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016;44:1565-72

12. Dallinga JM, Benjaminse A, Lemmink KA. Which screening tools can predict injury to the lower extremities in team sports?: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2012;42:791-815

13. Ghosh N, Kruse D, Subeh M, Lahham S, Fox J. Comparing Point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS) to MRI for the Diagnosis of Medial Compartment Knee Injuries. Journal of medical ultrasound. 2017;25:167-72

14. Levine BD, Motamedi K, Seeger LL. Imaging of the shoulder: a comparison of MRI and ultrasound. Current sports medicine reports. 2012;11:239-43

15. Lee KT, Park YU, Jegal H, Park JW, Choi JP, Kim JS. New method of diagnosis for chronic ankle instability: comparison of manual anterior drawer test, stress radiography and stress ultrasound. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2014;22:1701-7

16. Khoury V, Guillin R, Dhanju J, Cardinal É. Ultrasound of ankle and foot: overuse and sports injuries. Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology: © Thieme Medical Publishers. 2007 p. 149-61

17. Majidi H, Niksolat F, Anbari K. Comparing the Accuracy of Radiography and Sonography in Detection of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Diagnostic Study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7:4015-8

18. Lee SH, Yun SJ. Feasibility of point-of-care knee ultrasonography for diagnosing anterior cruciate and posterior cruciate ligament tears in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38:237-42

19. Lewis RA, Cook CR, Smith PA, Stannard JP, Sharp RL, Blecha KM. et al. Knee Ultrasonography to Determine Risk for Noncontact Injuries in Collegiate American Football Players. J Knee Surg. 2020;33:666-72

20. Greco NJ, Anderson AF, Mann BJ, Cole BJ, Farr J, Nissen CW. et al. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in Comparison to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Short Form 36 in Patients with Focal Articular Cartilage Defects. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2009;38:891-902

21. Grevnerts HT, Terwee CB, Kvist J. The measurement properties of the IKDC-subjective knee form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:3698-706

22. Owoeye OBA, Palacios-Derflingher L, Pasanen K, HubkaRao T, Wiley P, Emery CA. The Burden and Risk Factors of Patellar and Achilles Tendinopathy in Youth Basketball: A Cohort Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 18

23. Gaulrapp H, Nührenbörger C. The Osgood-Schlatter disease: a large clinical series with evaluation of risk factors, natural course, and outcomes. International Orthopaedics. 2021

24. Newman JS, Newberg AH. Basketball injuries. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;48:1095-111

25. Abicalaf CARP, Nakada LN, dos Santos FRA, Akiho I, dos Santos ACA, Imamura M. et al. Ultrasonography findings in knee osteoarthritis: a prospective observational cross-sectional study of 100 patients. Scientific Reports. 2021;11:16589

26. Fazekas ML, Sugimoto D, Cianci A, Minor JL, Corrado GD, d'Hemecourt PA. Ultrasound examination and patellar tendinopathy scores in asymptomatic college jumpers. The Physician and Sportsmedicine. 2018;46:477-84

27. Cook JL, Khan KM, Kiss ZS, Purdam CR, Griffiths L. Prospective imaging study of asymptomatic patellar tendinopathy in elite junior basketball players. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2000;19:473-9

28. Mendonça LD, Ocarino JM, Bittencourt NFN, Macedo LG, Fonseca ST. Association of Hip and Foot Factors With Patellar Tendinopathy (Jumper's Knee) in Athletes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48:676-84

29. Kaneuchi Y, Otoshi K, Hakozaki M, Sekiguchi M, Watanabe K, Igari T. et al. Bony Maturity of the Tibial Tuberosity With Regard to Age and Sex and Its Relationship to Pathogenesis of Osgood-Schlatter Disease: An Ultrasonographic Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6:2325967117749184

30. Ladenhauf HN, Seitlinger G, Green DW. Osgood-Schlatter disease: a 2020 update of a common knee condition in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020;32:107-12

31. Xia XP, Chen H, Zhou B. Ultrasonography for meniscal injuries in knee joint: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness. 2016 56 10: 1179-87

32. Dong F, Zhang L, Wang S, Dong D, Xu J, Wu H. et al. The diagnostic accuracy of B-mode ultrasound in detecting meniscal tears: a systematic review and pooled meta-analysis. Med Ultrason. 2018;20:164-9

33. Mureşan S, Mureşan M, Voidăzan S, Neagoe R. The accuracy of musculoskeletal ultrasound examination for the exploration of meniscus injuries in athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017;57:589-94

34. Cao J, Zheng B, Meng X, Lv Y, Lu H, Wang K. et al. A novel ultrasound scanning approach for evaluating femoral cartilage defects of the knee: comparison with routine magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2018;13:178

35. Mouzopoulos G, Borbon C, Siebold R. Patellar chondral defects: a review of a challenging entity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:1990-2001

Author contact

Corresponding address Corresponding author: Wen-Chung Tsai MD, PhD, Vice-superintendent, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan. Professor, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Professor, School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taiwan. E-mail:

Received 2022-2-22
Accepted 2022-10-5
Published 2022-10-17

Citation styles

Ho, C.S., Yu, T.Y., Chen, C.H., Lin, Y.C., Tsai, W.C. (2022). On-site Ultrasound Screens out Asymptomatic Knee Lesions in Elite Adolescent Male Basketball Players. International Journal of Medical Sciences, 19(13), 1856-1863.

Ho, C.S.; Yu, T.Y.; Chen, C.H.; Lin, Y.C.; Tsai, W.C. On-site Ultrasound Screens out Asymptomatic Knee Lesions in Elite Adolescent Male Basketball Players. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2022, 19 (13), 1856-1863. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.72299.

Ho CS, Yu TY, Chen CH, Lin YC, Tsai WC. On-site Ultrasound Screens out Asymptomatic Knee Lesions in Elite Adolescent Male Basketball Players. Int J Med Sci 2022; 19(13):1856-1863. doi:10.7150/ijms.72299.

Ho CS, Yu TY, Chen CH, Lin YC, Tsai WC. 2022. On-site Ultrasound Screens out Asymptomatic Knee Lesions in Elite Adolescent Male Basketball Players. Int J Med Sci. 19(13):1856-1863.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( See for full terms and conditions.