PDF

Int J Med Sci 2020; 17(4):457-470. doi:10.7150/ijms.38832 This issue Cite

Research Paper

Oxidative Stress Down-Regulates MiR-20b-5p, MiR-106a-5p and E2F1 Expression to Suppress the G1/S Transition of the Cell Cycle in Multipotent Stromal Cells

Lihui Tai^1,2,*, Chiu-Jung Huang³ , Kong Bung Choo^1,4 , Soon Keng Cheong^1,5, Tunku Kamarul⁶

1. Centre for Stem Cell Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Selangor, Malaysia
2. Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Selangor, Malaysia;
3. Department of Animal Science & Graduate Institute of Biotechnology, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan;
4. Department of Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Selangor, Malaysia
5. Dean's Office, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Selangor, Malaysia;
6. Tissue Engineering Group, National Orthopedic Centre of Excellence for Research and Learning & Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
* Present address: MAKNA Cancer Research Institute, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

✉ Corresponding authors: Kong Bung Choo, PhD, Senior Professor, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences & Centre for Stem Cell Research, Universiti Tunku Abdual Rahman, Sungai Long Campus, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia. Email: chookbedu.my or Chiu-Jung Huang, PhD, Professor, Department of Animal Science & Graduate Institute of Biotechnology, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan. Email: hqr2pccu.edu.tw More

Abstract

Oxidative stress has been linked to senescence and tumorigenesis via modulation of the cell cycle. Using a hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂)-induced oxidative stress-induced premature senescence (OSIPS) model previously reported by our group, this study aimed to investigate the effects of oxidative stress on microRNA (miRNA) expression in relation to the G1-to-S-phase (G1/S) transition of the cell cycle and cell proliferation. On global miRNA analysis of the OSIPS cells, twelve significantly up- or down-regulated miRNAs were identified, the target genes of which are frequently associated with cancers. Four down-regulated miR-17 family miRNAs are predicted to target key pro- and anti-proliferative proteins of the p21/cyclin D-dependent kinase (CDK)/E2F1 pathway to modulate G1/S transition. Two miR-17 miRNAs, miR-20-5p and miR-106-5p, were confirmed to be rapidly and stably down-regulated under oxidative stress. While H₂O₂ treatment hampered G1/S transition and suppressed DNA synthesis, miR-20b-5p/miR-106a-5p over-expression rescued cells from growth arrest in promoting G1/S transition and DNA synthesis. Direct miR-20b-5p/miR-106a-5p regulation of p21, CCND1 and E2F1 was demonstrated by an inverse expression relationship in miRNA mimic-transfected cells. However, under oxidative stress, E2F1 expression was down-regulated, consistent with hampered G1/S transition and suppressed DNA synthesis and cell proliferation. To explain the observed E2F1 down-regulation under oxidative stress, a scheme is proposed which includes miR-20b-5p/miR-106a-5p-dependent regulation, miRNA-E2F1 autoregulatory feedback and E2F1 response to repair oxidative stress-induced DNA damages. The oxidative stress-modulated expression of miR-17 miRNAs and E2F1 may be used to develop strategies to retard or reverse MSC senescence in culture, or senescence in general.

Keywords: oxidative stress, miR-20b-5p & miR-106a-5p, miR-17 family, p21/CDK/E2F1 pathway, E2F1, G1/S transition of cell cycle

Introduction

Oxidative stress is a physiological process induced by reactive oxygen (ROS) and/or nitrogen species [1,2]. Highly reactive ROS include superoxide anion (O₂^-) and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), which may cause damages to macromolecules and consequently the associated cellular and metabolic processes. Hence, oxidative stress is associated with aging and diseases, including cancer [2-6]. Cells are, fortunately, equipped with antioxidant defense mechanisms [7,8].

Multipotent stromal cells (MSC) are able to self-renew and exhibit multilineage differentiation ability, thus, presenting great potentials in therapeutic applications in regenerative medicine and cell therapy [9,10]. However, proliferating MSC ages rapidly in culture, hampering therapeutic potentials [10,11]. The mechanism of such debilitation is not well understood. We have previously reported the establishment of oxidative stress-induced premature senescence (OSIPS) in Wharton's Jelly (WJ)-MSC by treatment with H₂O₂ [12]. H₂O₂ treatment of cells causes accumulation of ROS to provoke oxidative stress, which, in turn, induces DNA single- and double-strand breaks and telomere losses to accelerate senescence [13,14]. It has been also established that the onset of senescence involves hampered self-renewal properties through disruption of the G1-to-S-phase (G1/S) transition of the cell cycle [15,16].

One of the important regulators of gene expression is the microRNA (miRNA). MiRNAs are small single-stranded non-coding RNAs that regulate expression of target genes via degradation or translational repression of the targeted transcripts. Hence, miRNAs control a broad range of cellular functions in stem cells, including self-renewal, proliferation and regulation of G1/S transition of the cell cycle [17-19]. Several miRNAs have previously been reported to be differentially expressed in senescence cells [19-23]. MiRNAs have also been reported to regulate oxidative stress-induced cellular senescence (reviewed in [24]). However, details on pathways that depict interactions between miRNAs and cell-cycle factors in senescence cells remain to be fully elucidated.

The G1/S transition of the cell cycle is closely associated with senescence. Using the OSIPS MSC model, this work focused on further elucidating the biochemical and cellular effects of oxidative stress on miRNA expression in regulating the G1/S phase of the cell cycle. Differentially expressed miRNAs and the target transcripts in the H₂O₂-induced oxidative-stressed MSC were identified, and selected miRNA-targeted genes in the p21/cyclin D-dependent kinase (CDK)/E2F1 pathway were verified by functional studies. The data show that down-regulated expression of miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p, both members of the miR-17 family, contribute to regulation of G1/S-phase transition of the cell cycle via promoting p21 expression and suppressing E2F1 in oxidative-stressed multipotent stromal cells.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture of Wharton's Jelly-derived MSC (WJ-MSC)

Human multipotent stromal cell lines (previously called mesenchymal stem cells in [12]) at passage 3 to 5, WJ0706, WJ0619 and WJ2000, derived from Wharton's Jelly (WJ) of the umbilical cord, were obtained with compliments from Cryocord Sdn Bhd, Selangor, Malaysia (http://www.cryocord.com.my), and has previously been described [12]. The cell lines were isolated and the MSC phenotype was confirmed at Cryocord as previously described [25]. WJ-MSC was cultured in complete Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium composed of nutrient mixture F12 (DMEM/F12) (Gibco, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. The medium was changed every 3 days and cells were re-plated at a density of 5,000 cells/cm² upon reaching 80% confluency. All cells were cultured at 37 ^oC in 5% carbon dioxide.

Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) treatment

H₂O₂ treatments were performed on confluent cells (3.75 x 10⁵ cells per T75 flask) as previously described [12]. In brief, cells at passage 6 to 8 were incubated in complete DMEM/F12 medium containing 200 µM H₂O₂ for 2 h; cells were washed and further cultured in fresh complete DMEM/F12 medium without H₂O₂ for 24 h for recovery before being harvested for subsequent assays. In the time-course experiments, the cells were treated with 200 µM H₂O₂ for different durations, followed by cell recovery for 24 h before RNA preparation. In the miRNA stability test, the H₂O₂-treated cells were cultured in complete medium for different time points before being harvested for RNA preparation.

miRNA microarray analysis

For miRNA profiling analysis, the Gen. 7 version of miRCURY LNA™ microRNA Arrays (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark), which included validated and T_m-normalized LNA™-based capture probes, were used. The arrays included 1,896 of the 1,921 annotated human miRNAs in the miRBase 18.0. Included in the arrays were also 25 proprietary miRPlus™ human miRNAs not yet annotated in miRBase. The arrays were done in four replicate spots. The quality of the total RNA was verified by an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer profile. Only total RNA preparations with RNA Integrity (RIN) values > 7 were used in the array. Total RNA (450 ng) from both the experimental samples and the reference was labeled with Hy3™ or Hy5™ fluorescent label, respectively, using the miRCURY LNA™ microRNA Hi-Power Labeling Kit, Hy3™/Hy5™ (Exiqon) following established procedure of the manufacturer. The Hy3™-labeled experimental and a Hy5™-labeled reference RNA samples were mixed pair-wise and hybridized to the miRCURY LNA™ microRNA Array using a Tecan HS4800™ hybridization station (Tecan, Grödig, Austria). The array slides were scanned using the Agilent G2565BA Microarray Scanner System (Agilent Technologies Inc., CA) and image analysis was carried out using the ImaGene® 9 microRNA Array Analysis Software (Exiqon). The quantified signals were background-corrected (Normexp with offset value 10, see [26] and normalized using the global LOcally WEighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOWESS) regression algorithm. For the present data set, a total of 1,469 probes were discarded by this filtering procedure, leaving 564 probes detectable above the background threshold for each sample. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed using the complete-linkage method and the Euclidean distance measure.

RNA isolation, reverse transcription and quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from WJ-MSC using RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, CA, USA). For miRNA expression analysis, miRNA polyadenylation was first performed using 1 μg total RNA, followed by first-strand cDNA synthesis using the NCode™ miRNA first-strand cDNA synthesis and qRT-PCR kit (Invitrogen, CA, USA). Ten-fold diluted cDNA was used for quantitative RT-PCR using a SYBR select master mix kit (Applied Biosystems, TX, USA) in a Rotor-Gene Q (Qiagen) thermal cycler. The primers used for qRT-PCR analysis are shown in Supplementary Table S1. PCR was carried out under the following conditions: 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. Data was analyzed by using the comparative ΔΔC_t method, and miRNA expression was normalized to the expression level of U6. All miRNA quantification experiments were performed in triplicates, and the data presented were derived from three independent experiments.

miRNA target prediction, ontology and KEGG pathway analysis

miRNA target transcripts were predicted using the web-based algorithms miRBase (www.mirbase.org), TargetScan Release 7.1 (http://www.targetscan.org/), DIANA-microT-CDs v5.0 (http://diana.imis.athena-innovation.gr) and miRTarBase (www.mirtarbase.mbc.nctu.edu.tw). Ontology and KEGG pathway analysis were performed by using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources v6.8 [27,28].

Protein extraction and western blotting analysis

Total protein lysates were prepared using the RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris•HCl pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, protease inhibitor cocktail, 0.1% SDS) (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). Western blot analysis was performed as previously described [29] using the following rabbit primary antibodies: p21 (Cell Signaling, MA, USA), E2F1 (Abcam), CCND1 (Abcam) or GAPDH (Cell Signaling). The relative optical density values of the proteins bands were quantified by comparing the H₂O₂-treated cells relative to untreated cells, or miRNA mimic-transfected cells relative to the negative mimic control cells, after normalization to the GAPDH loading control using Image J software version 1.49v (National Institutes of Health, MD, USA).

Luciferase reporter assay

PCR products of full-length or segments of 3'-untranslated region (3'UTR) of the target genes harboring the predicted miR-20b-5p or miR-106a-5p binding sites were cloned into the dual luciferase (Firefly/Renilla) reporter vector pmirGLO using the restriction enzyme combinations SacI/XbaI or SalI/XhoI[30]. The colorectal cancer cell line HCT-15 was co-transfected in 24-well plates using 1µl Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) with 200 ng empty pmirGLO or the pmirGLO/3'-UTR construct, and 10nM miRNA mimic or a validated nonspecific negative control miRNA mimic (Ambion, CA, USA) and the subsequent luciferase assay was performed as described [29].

Transfection of miRNA mimic and BrdU assays

To test the effects of miRNA over-expression, WJ0706 cells were transfected with 25 nM or 50 nM of miRNA mimics, or a validated nonspecific negative control miRNA mimic (Ambion) in 24-well plates using 1µl Lipofectamine2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers' protocols. Twenty-four hours post transfection, fresh medium was changed and the cells were harvested 48 h post-transfection for BrdU assays (Cell Signaling Technology) in triplicates in three independent biological experiments as described [29].

Cell cycle analysis

Twenty-four hours post-H₂O₂ treatment and forty-eight hours post-miRNA transfection, the cells were harvested and were fixed overnight with 70% cold ethanol at -20 °C. The cells were then treated with 1mg/mL RNase A and stained with 10µg/mL propidium iodide in the dark for 30 min at 37 ^oC, followed by analysis on a FACS Canto-II analyzer (BD Biosciences, CA, USA). A total of 100,000 events were recorded for each sample. The experiments were done three times independently before quantification and statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed in Microsoft Excel 2010 using the statistical formula to obtain the mean values, standard deviation and variance. Real-time RT-PCR results were reported as average of log (fold change) ± standard error. All data were analyzed by Student's t test using the negative controls as reference. Statistical significance was accepted at p<0.05.

Results

Global expression analysis identifies deregulated miRNAs associated with signaling processes, cell cycle regulation and tumorigenesis under oxidative stress

To identify oxidative stress-associated miRNAs in the OSIPS cells, global miRNA expression profiles of three WJ-MSC lines, WJ0706, WJ0619 and WJ2000, and the respective H₂O₂-treated cells, were established by microarray analysis. Only twenty-eight up-regulated and twenty-two down-regulated miRNAs were identified in the H₂O₂-treated cells relative to the untreated cells (Supplementary Table S2). A heatmap was constructed using the fifty deregulated miRNAs for unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis: the data were clustered into the control (untreated) and H₂O₂-treated groups as anticipated (Figure 1A). Out of the fifty deregulated miRNAs, only seven up-regulated miRNAs answered to the criteria of log₂ (fold change)>1.0 and p<0.05, and five down-regulated miRNAs fulfilled the criteria of log₂(fold change) <-1.0 and p<0.05 (Table 1); the twelve miRNAs were further subjected to gene ontology and KEGG pathway analyses. Amongst the top 10 affected biological and molecular processes (Supplementary Table S3), most notable are 258 genes expressed in processes associated with gene regulation (gene count n=85, 32.9%), kinase activity and signaling (n=42, 16.3%) and cell cycle regulation (n=5, 1.9%) (Table 2). In particular, the targeted processes of post-transcriptional gene silencing by RNA (GO:0035194) and miRNA-mediated inhibition of translation (GO:0035278) are consistent with the post-transcriptional regulation properties of miRNAs. KEGG analysis also predicts involvement of signaling pathways (hsa04012 & hsa04070, n=13) and the cell cycle process (hsa04110) (Figure 1B, asterisked) in both the up- and down-regulated miRNA groups. It is noteworthy that twenty-eight (45.9%) of the sixty-one predicted genes in the KEGG pathways of the up-regulated miRNAs, and forty-eight (73.8%) of the sixty-five down-regulated miRNAs are associated with pathogenesis pathways of various cancers (Figure 1B).

 Figure 1 

Differentially expressed miRNAs in oxidative-stressed multipotent stromal cells. (A) Heatmap and unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the top fifty differentially expressed miRNAs in three H₂O₂-treated WJ-MSC lines WJ0706, WJ2000 and WJ0619 (see Supplementary Table S2 for a full list). Color code for relative miRNA expression levels: red and green represent expression levels below and above the reference channel, respectively. Normalized log₂(fold change) ratio values were used for the analysis. The down-regulated miR-17 family miRNAs that were further investigated in this work are boxed (see also Table 1). (B) Top 10 KEGG pathways of the differentially expressed miRNAs. The number of predicted genes in each cancer-associated pathway is shown on the right end of the bar, and the percentage of the total number of the predicted cancer genes is shown in the box. Asterisks indicate pathways that are associated with signaling or the cell cycle (see also Supplementary Table S3).

 Figure 2 

Oxidative stress induces long-term down-regulation of miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p. (A) Sequence alignment of the miR-17 family miRNAs. The seed sequence is in bold letters and is boxed. (B) Validation of down-regulated expression of the miR-17 family miRNAs in three H₂O₂-treated MSC lines by real-time RT-PCR. The control was cells untreated with H₂O₂. (C, D) Rapid down-regulation of miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p in MSC on H₂O₂ treatment. MiRNA expression was assayed in WJ0706 cells treated with 200 µM H₂O₂ for 0.5 to 2 h (C), or after the 2-h H₂O₂ treatment, the washed cells were further cultured for an extended period of time in fresh medium without H₂O₂ (D) before real-time RT-PCR analysis. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 were relative to the untreated control samples.

In the up-regulated miRNA group (Table 1), miR-146a-5p and miR-146b-5p have previously been shown to be deregulated in expression in late-passage fibroblast cells [31]. The remaining five up-regulated miRNAs were first reported in deep sequencing of small RNA transcriptomes of several types of cancer [32-36]. In the down-regulated group, miR-16-5p is a tumor suppressor miRNA reportedly involved in regulating the cell cycle and apoptosis [37], consistent with the gene ontology data above (Figure 1B & Table 2). The remaining down-regulated miRNAs all belong to the miR-17 family and are highly homologous in the sequences, and share the same seed sequence (Figure 2A) [38]. Down-regulated expression of the four miR-17 family members was confirmed in real-time RT-PCR analysis in the three WJ-MSC cell lines after H₂O₂ treatment (Figure 2B). Of the four miR-17 miRNAs, the chromosome 13-associated miR-17-5p and miR-20a-5p have previously been studied in relation to differentiation, tumorigenesis and the G1-to-S-phase transition of the cell cycle [30, 39-40]. However, the chromosome X-linked miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p have not previously been investigated, and were the focus of the present work in relation to oxidative stress-induced deregulation of the G1/S-phase transition.

To first investigate the expression kinetics of miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p under oxidative stress, WJ0706 cells were treated with H₂O₂ for various periods of time. Data showed that H₂O₂ treatment for 0.5 h was sufficient to rapidly down-regulate expression of both miRNAs, and the suppressed miRNA levels were maintained for up to 2 h (Figure 2C). The data, thus, established a direct and rapid responsiveness of miR-20b-5p/miR-106a-5p to H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress. It was further shown that after 2 h H₂O₂ treatment, the suppressed miRNA expression levels were maintained for up to 48 h in the cell recovery period in fresh medium without H₂O₂ (Figure 2D), indicating irreversible long-term miRNA down-regulation in the oxidative-stressed cells.

Oxidative stress suppresses while miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p promote cell proliferation, G1/S transition and DNA synthesis

In stem cells, the G1/S transition of the cell cycle is accelerated [15, 41-42] while it is retarded in senescence cells [43-45]. The effects of H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress on the cell cycle were evaluated in flow cytometric (FACS) analysis. Representative FACS profiles of the three cell lines analyzed are shown in Figure 3A; combined data of three independent experiments of the three cell lines tested are shown in Figure 3B. The results showed that the fractions of G1-phase cells significantly increased on H₂O₂ treatment, with concurrent declines of the S1 and G2 cell populations, indicating hampered G1/S transition [46]. To obtain supporting evidence, DNA synthesis rates of H₂O₂-treated cells were determined in BrdU assays (Figure 3C). The data, indeed, showed that on H₂O₂ treatment, DNA synthesis rates were significantly suppressed, supporting that the G1-phase cells were blocked, or delayed, from entry into the S phase.

To elucidate the association between the miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p and cell proliferation, transient over-expression of the miRNA mimics in H₂O₂-treated and late replicative senescence (RS) WJ0706 cells was performed, followed by cell counts in cell growth analysis. Since the two miRNAs shares an identical seed sequences and a high degree of sequence homology (18/21) (Figure 2A), the interchangeability of the two miRNAs was also tested. On 2 h H₂O₂ treatment, followed by further culturing in H₂O₂-free medium, the negative miRNA mimic-transfected control cells entered growth arrest on day 2 and up to day 10. On the other hand, growth arrest of the miR-20b-5p and/or miR-106a-5p mimic-transfected cells ended when the cells entered the log phase of growth on day 6 to day 8 (Figure 4A). The growth delay was probably due to delays for the exogenous miRNAs to exert their gene regulatory and the subsequent biochemical actions. The late-passage RS cells did not seem to have a clear growth-arrest phase as shown in the early-passage cells on H₂O₂ treatment; however, the miRNA mimic-transfected RS cells grew more rapidly than the negative miRNA mimic-transfected control cells (Figure 4B). Furthermore, the miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p mimics, when used individually at 50 nM, or in combination at a combined final concentration of 50 nM, displayed similar growth patterns. The results indicate that the two miRNAs are interchangeable in exerting biological functions, echoing our previous hypothesis that miRNA redundancy provides a fail-proof scheme in miRNA regulation of crucial cellular events [47].

 Figure 3 

Oxidative stress suppresses G1-to-S-phase transition of the cell cycle and DNA synthesis. (A, B) Effects of H₂O₂ treatment on G1/S transition. In the flow cytometry analysis, a representative dataset of the of the three cell lines tested after treatment with 200 µM H₂O₂ for 2 h is shown in (A); the mean values of three independent experiments and combining data of the three cell lines is shown in (B). (C) DNA synthesis rate of H₂O₂-treated cells determined by BrdU assays at different time points. All the data shown are the means of three independent experiments. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 were relative to the untreated cells.

 Figure 4 

MiR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p promote cell proliferation, G1/S transition and DNA synthesis. (A, B) Effects of over-expression of miRNA mimics on cell growth in H₂O₂-treated (A) or late-passage (P23) replicative senescence (RS) WJ0706 cells (B). (A) Transfection of miRNA mimics was performed for 24 h, followed by 200 µM H₂O₂ treatment for 2 h before the cells were washed and cultured in fresh medium without H₂O₂. Cells were counted on the specified days post treatment. (B) Growth curve of miRNA-transfected P23 RS cells without H₂O₂ treatment. (C - E) Effects of over-expression of the miRNA mimics in WJ0706 cells on cell viability, determined by MTT analysis (C), distribution of G1-, S- and G2-phase cells, determined by flow cytometry (FACS) analysis (D), and DNA synthesis rate, determined by BrdU analysis (E). In (A-C), only the top halves of the error bars are shown; asterisks shown in different colors indicate statistical significance matching the different experimental curves of the same colors. The color codes for the miRNA transfection shown in (A) also apply to (B) & (C). The blue curves are the no-miRNA transfection negative controls. Data presented were from three independent experiments. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 were relative to the nonspecific negative control (NC) mimic.

The biological role of miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p in modulating cell proliferation, the cell cycle and DNA synthesis was next investigated in MTT, flow cytometry and BrdU assays, respectively (Figures 4C-4E). In MTT analysis, WJ0706 cells not under oxidative stress maintained a steady growth rate both in the negative miRNA mimic-transfected control cells and in the miRNA mimic-transfected cells; however, miR-20b-5p and/or miR-106a-5p over-expression consistently resulted in higher numbers of viable cells and, thus, higher cell proliferation rates (Figure 4C). Interchangeability of the two miRNAs was again observed. Likewise, flow cytometric analysis of the miRNA mimic-transfected cells showed that either one of the miRNA mimics resulted in a significant decrease in the G1-phase cell population with concurrent increases in the S- and G2-phase cells when compared with transfection of a negative control miRNA mimic; furthermore, a significant G1 cell reduction was observed on the combined used of both the miRNA mimics (Figure 4D). The data support that miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p play a role in modulating the G1/S transition. The finding was further supported by data of BrdU analysis, which showed significantly enhanced DNA synthesis rates on single or co-transfection of the two miRNAs (Figure 4E).

Taken together, evidences presented in this (Figures 3 & 4) and the preceding section (Figure 2) indicate that H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress leads to down-regulated expression of miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p, and suppresses G1/S transition and DNA synthesis. On the other hand, the miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p over-expression enhances cell growth and proliferation, the G1/S transition and DNA synthesis. Since miRNAs are negative regulators, the H₂O₂ and miRNA data are consistent.

miR-20b-5p/miR-106a-5p and oxidative stress modulate the p21/CDK/E2F pathway

In normal cells, enhanced cell proliferation may be due to more rapid G1/S-phase transition via concerted regulation of pro- and anti-proliferative factors of the p21/CDK/E2F pathway [11,17]. Database interrogation and bioinformatics analysis have predicted that the miR-20a-5p and miR-106a-5p target multiple components of the p21/CDK/E2F1 pathway, which modulates the G1/S transition of the cell cycle (Figure 5), as has been forecast by KEGG pathway analysis above (Figure 1B & Table 2). In this work, further functional analysis was done on the p21 protein, the downstream cyclin D1 and D2 (CCND1/2) and E2F1.

 Figure 5 

MiR-17 family miRNAs are predicted to target the p21/CDK/E2F1 pathway to modulate the G1/S transition of the cell cycle under oxidative stress. Blunted red lines indicate bioinformatics-predicted negative regulation by the miR-17 family miRNAs; asterisks indicate miRNAs that were further analyzed in this study. R: the restricted entry point of the cell cycle. The thick red cross denotes block in DNA synthesis.

MiR-20b-5p/miR-106a-5p targeting of transcripts of p21, CCND1, CCND2 and E2F1 was first verified by luciferase assays (Figures 6A & 6B). The putative miRNA target sites, which are common for both miRNAs (Figure 6A), was cloned into the dual luciferase (Firefly/Renilla) reporter vector pmirGLO. In the presence of a miR-20b-5p mimic, the p21 and E2F1, but not CCDN1/2, constructs showed reduced luciferase activities, whereas the miR-106a-5p mimic down-regulated luciferase expression of all four proteins (Figure 6B), signifying miRNA targeting of the transcripts. MiRNA targeting was further demonstrated by an inverse relationship in the miRNA levels and levels of the targeted transcripts and proteins in the miRNA mimic-transfected cells. Over-expression of miR-20b-5p or miR-106a-5p significantly down-regulated the p21, CCND1 and E2F1 mRNA levels (Figure 6C, left panel). Likewise, the proteins levels were also down-regulated (Figure 6C, right panel) supporting miRNA targeting.

Under H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress, results showed elevated p21 and CCND1 mRNA and protein levels in the different MSC cell lines tested (Figure 6D). However, the E2F1 mRNA levels were all significantly low in all the three cell lines tested (Figure 6D, left panel); however, the E2F1 protein level was lower than the control only in WJ2000 cells, but no significant changes were observed in the other two cell lines on H₂O₂ treatment (Figure 6D, right panel). Taken together, the data show that miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p target and down-regulate expression of p21, CCND1 and E2F1, and that oxidative stress exerts the reverse effects in up-regulating p21 and CCND1 expression, but not E2F1. Both the miRNA and oxidative stress effects may be linked to their effects on suppressed cell proliferation and DNA synthesis and hampered G1/S transition described above.

Discussion

Oxidative stress-deregulated miR-17 family miRNAs are frequently associated with cancers and senescence

In this study, twelve miRNAs that are significantly deregulated in oxidative stress-induced senescence cells were identified (Table 1), many of which are predicted to target genes associated with various cancers (Figure 1B; Supplementary Table S3). MiR-146a has previously been shown to be up-regulated by p53-binding protein-1 to regulate NF-kB activities associated with metastasis of xenografted breast cancer cells in nude mice [48]. Besides the two miR-146 family miRNAs, the other five up-regulated miRNAs were first reported in deep sequencing of small RNA transcriptomes of malignant B cells, melanoma and breast cancers [32-36], and have not been fully annotated and investigated. It is, however, noteworthy that the gene encoding miR-4732-5p is located in close proximity to the ERBB2 receptor gene, which is frequently amplified and over-expressed in breast cancer cells [34]; miR-4732-5p may be collaterally amplified in cancer cells. In the down-regulated miRNA group (Table 1), miR-16 is a well-characterized tumor suppressor that regulates the cell cycle and apoptosis [37]. On the other hand, the miR-17 family miRNAs are deregulated in a number of cancers, and have been implicated as oncomirs [38,49]. The four miR-17 family members are paralogous genes located in the miR-17~92 and miR-106a~363 miRNA clusters on chromosomes 13 and X, respectively [38], and have been extensively studied in their roles in tumorigenesis [49-53]. Deregulation of the validated miR-17~92 targets, including E2F1, TP53INP1, TGFβ and PTEN, is known to contribute to uncontrolled cell proliferation, tumor growth, apoptosis and metastasis [39,49]. Taken together, various reports, including this study, on the deregulated expression of the miR-17 family miRNAs are consistent with the notion that oxidative stress, and possibly cellular senescence, share some common features with the tumorigenesis process [3-4, 54,55].

 Figure 6 

MiR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p and oxidative stress regulate specific genes of the p21/CDK/E2F pathway. (A) 3'-UTR of the transcripts of genes of the p21 pathway; the predicted miR-20b-5p/miR-106a-5p target sites (vertical green bar) are shown. Bent arrows indicate the position of the PCR primers used in the amplification of the 3'UTR segments (boxed) cloned into the pmirGLO vector [30]. (B) Validation of targeting of miR-20b-5p/miR-106a-5p by luciferase assays. HCT-15 cells were co-transfected with pmirGLO/3'UTR or the pmirGLO blank vector, and a miR-20b-5p or miR-106a-5p mimic, or a negative control mimic. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 were relative to the data of pmirGLO/3'UTR without transfected miRNA or negative control (NC) mimic. (C) Inverse relationship between expression levels of miR-20b-5p/miR-106a-5p and the target transcripts and proteins in miRNA mimic-transfected cells, determined by qRT-PCR (left panel) and western blot analysis (right panel). (D) Effects of oxidative stress on the miRNA target transcript and protein levels in three MSC cell lines. The total RNA (left panel) and protein samples (right panel) were prepared from H₂O₂-treated (2 h) or -untreated cells, which were further cultured for 24 h post H₂O₂ treatment before being harvested for further analysis. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 were relative to the untreated or the negative control (NC) samples. In the western blots in (C) and (D): RL, relative levels compared to the negative control (C) or untreated control (D) samples.

 Figure 7 

A proposed scheme on miR-20b-5p/miR-106a-5p-dependent and -independent regulation of E2F1 cellular levels and G1/S transition under oxidative stress. To regulate the E2F1 level under oxidative stress, three miRNA-dependent (I, II and III) and a miRNA-independent (IV) routes are proposed. Routes (I) & (II): the down-regulated miRNAs lead to up-regulated expression of p21 (I) and CCND1/2 and CDK4/6 (II) independently; route (III): miRNA-E2F1 auto-regulatory feedback regulation; route (IV): oxidative stress induces DNA damage response leading to recruitment of E2F1 to DNA break sites. The combined effects of the four pathways result in E2F1 down-regulation, inhibition of G1/S transition and DNA synthesis, suppressed cell proliferation and premature senescence. See text for further description of the proposed scheme. Solid lines indicate events that are supported by evidences presented in this work, as are up- and downward-pointing red arrows that indicate up- or down-regulated gene expression, and the red crosses indicate suppression of the indicated cellular processes. Blue dashed lines and lettering indicate proposed regulatory events that have been described in the literature.

In the up-regulated miRNA group, deregulated expression of miR-146a has previously been shown in long-term culturing or late-passage replicative senescence human fibroblast and endothelial cells [31,56]. Besides possible roles in tumorigenesis, the chromosome 13-associated miR-17 and miR-20a have also previously been investigated in replicative aging models, including MSC [57]. The chromosome X-associated miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p were shown in this work to target both pro- and anti-proliferative proteins (Figure 4), echoing previous reports [30,38-40]. In stress-induced premature senescence fibroblasts, miR-17 suppresses p21 expression [58], as was also observed for miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p, in this work (Figure 6C).

A proposed scheme on miR-20b-5p/miR-106a-5p-dependent and -independent regulation of E2F1 expression and G1/S transition under oxidative stress

To investigate the role of miRNA in oxidative-stressed cells in this work, miR-20a-5p and miR-106a-5p were first identified to be down-regulated in H₂O₂-treated cells (Figures 1 & 2). H₂O₂ treatment was further shown to suppress G1/S transition and DNA synthesis (Figure 3) whereas the opposite effects were shown when miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p were over-expressed (Figure 4). Since miRNAs are negative regulators, the H₂O₂ and miRNA data are consistent. MiR-20a-5p and miR-106a-5p targeting of p21, CCND1 and E2F1 was predicted by bioinformatics analysis (Figure 5), and was confirmed in luciferase assays (Figures 6A & 6B) and in correlation with down-regulation of the three targets on miRNA over-expression (Figure 6C). On H₂O₂ treatment, p21 and CCND1 levels were up-regulated (Figure 6D). However, H₂O₂ treatment resulted in suppressed E2F1 mRNA levels in all the three MSC cell lines tested, and suppressed E2F1 protein level only in WJ2000 cells, but the E2F1 levels were not significantly altered in the other two cell lines (Figure 6D).

Based on the data presented in this and a previous work [12], and also drawing literature on the analysis of other miR-17 members, a scheme is proposed here to explain the E2F1 response and in relation to miR-20a-5p/miR-106a-5p expression under oxidative stress. It is proposed that under oxidative stress, four separate but inter-related miR-20a-5p/miR-106a-5p-dependent and -independent events collectively modulate E2F1 expression and G1/S transition to affect cell proliferation and oxidative stressed-induced premature senescence (Figure 7). In event (I), oxidative stress down-regulates expression of miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p, which, in turn, up-regulates p21 expression. In event (II), the two miRNAs independently and individually target and regulate CCND1/2 and CDK4/6. Despite the fact that p21 is an inhibitor of CCND1/2-CDK4/6, CCND1/2 is still up-regulated, and the E2F1 levels are suppressed. To explain the discrepancies, event (III) is proposed based on reports of an auto-regulatory feedback loop between E2F factors and other miR-17 family members, viz. miR-17-5p and miR-20a, and also other miRNAs [59-62]. MiR-20b-5p/miR-106a-5p, being members of the same miR-17 family, and E2F1 may also be under auto-regulatory feedback control under oxidative stress in that the miRNAs inhibit E2F1 expression, and, on the other hand, E2F1 binds to the promoter of the miR-17 miRNA clusters to block miRNA expression. Event (IV) is miRNA-independent in which oxidative stress triggers DNA damages, which activate the DNA damage response to recruit E2F1 and CCND1 to the sites of the DNA breaks to promote DNA repair [63-64], and to initiate temporary cell cycle arrest under oxidative stress [65-66]. Hence, the E2F1 levels in the H₂O₂-treated cells are proposed to be the outcome of the cumulative effects of the interactions and balances between the four miRNA-dependent and -independent events, and are subjected to further modulation by multiple factors, including the physiological state of the cell and the relative spatial- and temporal-dependent abundance of specific factors. Besides affecting the G1/S transition of the cell cycle reported here, H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress may also exert influences on MSC differentiation (reviewed in [67]) and other cellular process via miRNA regulation. These are important issues worthy of further investigations.

Conclusions

Global miRNA profiling of MSC under oxidative stress and KEGG pathway analysis in this work lend further support that oxidative stress share numerous affected target genes with the tumorigenesis process. This work also shows that oxidative stress down-regulates expression of the miR-17 family miRNAs, and that the miR-17 family members, miR-20b-5p and miR-106a-5p, inhibit expression of E2F1 via targeting p21 and CCND1 to suppress the G1/S-phase transition of the cell cycle, possibly resulting in premature senescence. Understanding the role of the miR-17 family miRNAs under oxidative stress may lead to the development of strategies to retard or reverse senescence in MSC culture, and to facilitate regenerative medicine.

Abbreviations

CCND1/2: cyclin D1/D2; CDK: cyclin-dependent kinase; E2F: E2F transcription factor; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; H₂O₂: hydrogen peroxide; miRNA: microRNA; MSC: multipotent stromal cells; NF-kB: nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; OSIPS: oxidative stress-induced premature senescence; p21: cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A; PTEN: phosphatase and tensin homolog; RB1: retinoblastoma protein 1; TGFβ: transforming growth factor, beta; WJ-MSC: Wharton's Jelly-derived MSC.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary tables.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Hans-Ingo Trompeter, University Düsseldorf, Germany, for generous gifts of the luciferase plasmids, and Mr. Chee Ying Wong, Cryocord, for the WJ-MSC cell lines used in this work.

Funding

This project was supported by a Ministry of Higher Education HIR-MoHE Grant [Reference number UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/ CHAN/03, account number - A000003- 50001].

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

References

1. Dasuri K, Zhang L Keller JN. Oxidative stress, neurodegeneration, and the balance of protein degradation and protein synthesis. Free Radical Biol Med. 2013;62:170-85

2. Newsholme P, Rebelato E, Abdulkader F, Krause M, Carpinelli A, Curi R. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species generation, antioxidant defenses, and β-cell function: a critical role for amino acids. J Endocrinol. 2012;214:11-20

3. Liguori I, Russo G, Curcio F, Bulli G. et al. Oxidative stress, aging, and diseases. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:757-72

4. Guillaumet-Adkins A, Yañez Y, Peris-Diaz MD, Calabria I, Palanca-Ballester C, Sandoval J. Epigenetics and oxidative stress in aging. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:9175806

5. Barja G. The mitochondrial free radical theory of aging. Progr Molec Biol Trans Sci. 2014;127:1-27

6. Sosa V, Moliné T, Somoza R, Paciucci R, Kondoh H, LLeonart ME. Oxidative stress and cancer: an overview. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12:376-90

7. Cencioni C, Spallotta F, Martelli F. et al. Oxidative stress and epigenetic regulation in ageing and age-related diseases. Int J Molec Sci. 2013;14:17643-63

8. Davies KJ. Oxidative stress, antioxidant defenses, and damage removal, repair, and replacement systems. IUBMB Life. 2000;50:279-89

9. Ullah I, Subbarao RB, Rho GJ. Human mesenchymal stem cells-current trends and future prospective. Biosci Rep. 2015:35

10. Trohatou O, Roubelakis MG. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells in regenerative medicine: past, present, and future. Cell Reprogram. 2017;19:217-224

11. Chandrasekaran A, Idelchik MDPS, Melendez JA. Redox control of senescence and age-related disease. Redox Biol. 2017;11:91-102

12. Choo KB, Tai L, Hymavathee KS, Wong CY, Nguyen PNN, Huang CJ. et al. Oxidative stress-induced premature senescence in Wharton's Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Med Sci. 2014;11:1201-7

13. Glade MJ, Meguid MM. A glance at … telomeres, oxidative stress, antioxidants, and biological aging. Nutrition. 2015;31:1447-51

14. Piano A, Titorenko VI. The intricate interplay between mechanisms underlying aging and cancer. Aging Dis. 2015;6:56-75

15. Boward B, Wu T, Dalton S. Concise review: control of cell fate through cell cycle and pluripotency networks. Stem Cells. 2016;34:1427-36

16. Signer RA, Morrison SJ. Mechanisms that regulate stem cell aging and life span. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:152-65

17. Bhattacharyya NP, Das E, Bucha S, Das S, Choudhury A. Regulation of cell cycle associated genes by microRNA and transcription factor. 19. Microrna. 2016;5:180-200

18. Guo WT, Wang X-W, Wang Y. Micro-management of pluripotent stem cells. Protein Cell. 2014;5:36-47

19. Bilsland AE, Revie J, Keith W. MicroRNA and senescence: the senectome, integration and distributed control. Crit Rev Oncog. 2013;18:373-90

20. Terlecki-Zaniewicz L, Lämmermann I, Latreille J, Bobbili MR, Pils V. et al. Small extracellular vesicles and their miRNA cargo are anti-apoptotic members of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. Aging. (Albany NY). 2018;10:1103-32

21. Choi SW, Lee JY, Kang KS. miRNAs in stem cell aging and age-related disease. Mech Ageing Dev. 2017;168:20-9

22. Meng X, Xue M, Xu P, Hu F, Sun B, Xiao Z. MicroRNA profiling analysis revealed different cellular senescence mechanisms in human mesenchymal stem cells derived from different origin. Genomics. 2017;109:147-57

23. Feliciano A, Sánchez-Sendra B, Kondoh H, Lleonart ME. MicroRNAs regulate key effector pathways of senescence. J Aging Res. 2011;2011:205378

24. Bu H, Wedel S, Cavinato M, Jansen-Dürr P. MicroRNA Regulation of Oxidative Stress-Induced Cellular Senescence. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:2398696

25. Leow SN, Luu CD, Hairul Nizam MH, Mok PL, Ruhaslizan R, Wong HS. et al. Safety and efficacy of human Wharton's Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells therapy for retinal degeneration. PLoS One. 2015;10:1-20

26. Ritchie ME, Silver J, Oshlack A, Holmes M, Diyagama D, Holloway A. et al. A comparison of background correction methods for two-colour microarrays. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2700-7

27. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:1-13

28. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources. Nature Protoc. 2009;4:44-57

29. Nguyen PNN, Choo KB, Huang CJ, Sugii S, Cheong SK, Kamarul T. miR-524-5p of the primate-specific C19MC miRNA cluster targets TP53IPN1- and EMT-associated genes to regulate cellular reprogramming. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8:214

30. Trompeter HI, Abbad H, Iwaniuk KM, Hafner M, Renwick N, Tuschl T. et al. MicroRNAs MiR-17, MiR-20a, and MiR-106b Act in concert to modulate E2F activity on cell cycle arrest during neuronal lineage differentiation of USSC. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16138

31. Bonifacio LN, Jarstfer MB. MiRNA profile associated with replicative senescence, extended cell culture, and ectopic telomerase expression in human foreskin fibroblasts. PLoS One. 2010;5:1-8

32. Boo L, Ho WY, Ali NM, Yeap SK, Ky H, Chan KG. et al. MiRNA transcriptome profiling of spheroid-enriched cells with cancer stem cell properties in human breast MCF-7 cell line. Int J Biol Sci. 2016;12:427-45

33. Li W, Shen S, Wu S, Chen Z, Hu C, Yan R. Regulation of tumorigenesis and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma tumor endothelial cells by microRNA-3178 and underlying mechanism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;464:881-7

34. Persson H, Kvist A, Rego N, Staaf J, Vallon-Christersson J, Luts L. et al. Identification of new microRNAs in paired normal and tumor breast tissue suggests a dual role for the ERBB2/Her2 gene. Cancer Res. 2011;71:78-86

35. Jima DD, Zhang J, Jacobs C, Richards KL, Dunphy CH, Choi WWL. et al. Deep sequencing of the small RNA transcriptome of normal and malignant human B cells identifies hundreds of novel microRNAs. Blood. 2010;116:118-28

36. Stark MS, Tyagi S, Nancarrow DJ, Boyle GM, Cook AL, Whiteman DC. et al. Characterization of the melanoma miRNAome by deep sequencing. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9685

37. Aqeilan RI, Calin GA, Croce CM. miR-15a and miR-16-1 in cancer: discovery, function and future perspectives. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17:215-20

38. Mogilyansky E, Rigoutsos I. The miR-17/92 cluster: a comprehensive update on its genomics, genetics, functions and increasingly important and numerous roles in health and disease. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:1603-14

39. Tan W, Li Y, Lim SG, Tan TMC. miR-106b-25/miR-17-92 clusters: polycistrons with oncogenic roles in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:5962-72

40. Cloonan N, Brown MK, Steptoe AL, Wani S, Chan WL, Forrest ARR. et al. The miR-17-5p microRNA is a key regulator of the G1/S phase cell cycle transition. Genome Biol. 2008;9:R127

41. Becker KA, Ghule PN, Therrien JA, Lian JB, Stein JL, Van Wijnen AJ. et al. Self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells is supported by a shortened G1 cell cycle phase. J Cell Physiol. 2006;209:883-93

42. Fluckiger AC, Marcy G, Marchand M, Négre D, Cosset FL, Mitalipov S. et al. Cell cycle features of primate embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2006;24:547-56

43. Dalton S, Coverdell PD. Linking the cell cycle to cell fate decisions. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25:592-600

44. Alt EU, Senst C, Murthy SN, Slakey DP, Dupin CL, Chaffin AE. et al. Aging alters tissue resident mesenchymal stem cell properties. Stem Cell Res. 2012;8:215-25

45. Shenghui HE, Nakada D, Morrison SJ, He S, Nakada D, Morrison SJ. Mechanisms of stem cell self-renewal. Annu Rev Cell Dev. 2009;25:377-406

46. Chen PM, Lin CH, Li NT, Wu YM, Lin MT, Hung SC. et al. c-Maf regulates pluripotency genes, proliferation/self-renewal, and lineage commitment in ROS-mediated senescence of human mesenchymal stem cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6:35404-18

47. Huang CJ, Nguyen PNN, Choo KB, Sugii S, Wee K, Cheong SK. et al. Frequent co-expression of miRNA-5p and -3p Species and cross-targeting in induced pluripotent stem cells. Int J Med Sci. 2014;11:824-33

48. Li X, Xu B, Moran MS, Zhao Y, Su P, Haffty BG. et al. 53BP1 functions as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer via the inhibition of NF-κB through miR-146a. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:2593-600

49. Wang B, Yang J, Xiao B. MicroRNA-20b (miR-20b) promotes the proliferation, migration, invasion, and tumorigenicity in esophageal cancer cells via the regulation of phosphatase and tensin homologue expression. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0164105

50. Zhu H, Han C, Wu T. MiR-17-92 cluster promotes hepatocarcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2015:36 1213-22

51. Shen G, Jia H, Tai Q, Li Y, Chen D. miR-106b downregulates adenomatous polyposis coli and promotes cell proliferation in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:211-9

52. Yau WL, Lam CSC, Ng L, Chow AKM, Chan STC, Chan JYK. et al. Over-expression of miR-106b promotes cell migration and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma by activating epithelial-mesenchymal transition process. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57882

53. Hayashita Y, Osada H, Tatematsu Y, Yamada H, Yanagisawa K, Tomida S. et al. A polycistronic microRNA cluster, miR-17-92, is overexpressed in human lung cancers and enhances cell proliferation. Cancer Res. 2005;65:9628-32

54. Aunan JR, Cho WC, Søreide K. The biology of aging and cancer: a brief overview of shared and divergent molecular hallmarks. Aging Dis. 2017;8:628-42

55. Lopez MF, Niu P, Wang L, Vogelsang M, Gaur M, Krastins B. et al. Opposing activities of oncogenic MIR17HG and tumor suppressive MIR100HG clusters and their gene targets regulate replicative senescence in human adult stem cells. NPJ Aging Mech Dis. 2017;3:7

56. Olivieri F, Lazzarini R, Recchioni R, Marcheselli F, Rippo MR, Di Nuzzo S. et al. MiR-146a as marker of senescence-Associated pro-inflammatory status in cells involved in vascular remodelling. Age. (Omaha). 2013;35:1157-72

57. Hackl M, Brunner S, Fortschegger K, Schreiner C, Micutkova L, Mück C. et al. miR-17, miR-19b, miR-20a, and miR-106a are down-regulated in human aging. Aging Cell. 2010;9:291-6

58. Li G, Luna C, Qiu J, Epstein DL, Gonzalez P. Alterations in microRNA expression in stress-induced cellular senescence. Mech Ageing Dev. 2009;130:731-41

59. Luo W, Li G, Yi Z, Nie Q, Zhang X. E2F1-miR-20a-5p/20b-5p auto-regulatory feedback loop involved in myoblast proliferation and differentiation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27904

60. Feng M, Yu Q. miR-449 regulates CDK-Rb-E2F1 through an auto-regulatory feedback circuit. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:213-4

61. Pickering MT, Stadler BM, Kowalik TF. miR-17 and miR-20a temper an E2F1-induced G1 checkpoint to regulate cell cycle progression. Oncogene. 2009;28:140-5

62. Sylvestre Y, De Guire V, Querido E, Mukhopadhyay UK, Bourdeau V, Major F, Ferbeyre G, Chartrand P. An E2F/miR-20a autoregulatory feedback loop. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:2135-43

63. Castillo DS, Campalans A, Belluscio LM, Carcagno AL, Radicella JP, Cánepa ET, Pregi N. E2F1 and E2F2 induction in response to DNA damage preserves genomic stability in neuronal cells. Cell Cycle. 2015;14:1300-14

64. Casimiro MC, Di Sante G, Ju X, Li Z, Chen K, Crosariol M, Yaman I, Gormley M, Meng H, Lisanti MP, Pestell RG. Cyclin D1 promotes androgen-dependent DNA damage repair in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2016;76:329-38

65. Chen J, Zhu F, Weaks RL, Biswas AK, Guo R, Li Y, Johnson DG. E2F1 promotes the recruitment of DNA repair factors to sites of DNA double-strand breaks. Cell Cycle. 2011;10:1287-94

66. Liu K, Luo Y, Lin FT, Lin WC. TopBP1 recruits Brg1/Brm to repress E2F1-induced apoptosis, a novel pRb-independent and E2F1-specific control for cell survival. Genes Dev. 2004;18:673-86

67. Agidigbi TS, Kim C. Reactive oxygen species in osteoclast differentiation and possible pharmaceutical targets of ROS-mediated osteoclast diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:E3576

Author contact

Corresponding authors: Kong Bung Choo, PhD, Senior Professor, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences & Centre for Stem Cell Research, Universiti Tunku Abdual Rahman, Sungai Long Campus, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia. Email: chookbedu.my or Chiu-Jung Huang, PhD, Professor, Department of Animal Science & Graduate Institute of Biotechnology, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan. Email: hqr2pccu.edu.tw

Received 2019-7-29
Accepted 2019-12-30
Published 2020-2-4

Citation styles

©2024 Ivyspring International Publisher. Terms of use